• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

  • The site has been updated!

    If you notice any issues, please let us know below!

    VIEW THREAD

Ohio Sheriff Opposes Exercise of Second Amendment Without a Permit

PatMiles

Private
Full Member
Minuteman
Feb 25, 2017
1,574
4,208

Screenshot-2022-03-08-110609-640x479.png
 
Communists are going to commie all the time and in EVERY way possible.

They all got woke and elected a rug muncher for Sheriff and her overbearing hate of men is making her slip out of control. She is a shining example of the one truth of law enforcement.

Hitler and Stalin did not change the cops..................................................they simply changed the laws and the same cops you thought were your friends arrested you, confiscated your property, raped your wives and kids and shipped you off to concentration camps for execution or death from slave labor.

If you happened to live, they swing by to apologize and tell you, "sorry bro, it was not me is was the laws."
 
Last edited:
This reflects the main diff I have with some LEOs...notice that I said some.

Some want cops to be the ONLY one with guns. Safer for them....yes. Leaves us fucked...hell yes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HD1911 and Mwalex
Hamilton County encompasses Cincinnati, so, not surprising.
Not a large city, but a Demoncrat one.
I remember driving there in about 1981 or so, there was a field with burned crosses used for regular gatherings still there.
 
Buckeye Firearms has been moving the State in the right direction. They are backing this, expect (hopeful) the governor will sign.
FOP against, but they are a worthless lobbying group(they lobby for the FOP - nobody else - they get panned regularly).
 
not surprised it's Ohio and the rules are for thee, not for me in socialists states.......
as usual votes have consequences. damn she's ugly too!!
 
From the story:
"I think that there will be people who carry weapons concealed for the purpose of being vigilantes."

I think if she did her job, there wouldn't be any need for vigilantism.

Let me add to that, not only does she need to do her job, but the county prosecutor needs to do theirs as well and keep historically violent people behind bars regardless of race. I seem to remember gun violence dropping dramatically when there was mandatory sentencing if a gun was used in a crime, even if no one was shot. Then the idiots in charge determined that was racist because of who it was going to jail under it and then overturned it. Predictably, gun crime went up. Now we need to carry to protect ourselves. Somme people love living in perpetual victim hood especially when it’s forced on them by people like her. I’m not one of them.
 
They scream the same bullshit every time these laws come up. TN passed constitutional carry last year and every local news channel had the sheriff and chief of police spouting the bullshit lines. Cops won't be safe and vigilante crap. Not once were they questioned about the states that already have it.
Animal Farm!!
 
You know what our Founding Fathers would want us to do , our duty to follow the Constitution.
I don't think the had man girls back then did they , is it a witch?
 
They scream the same bullshit every time these laws come up. TN passed constitutional carry last year and every local news channel had the sheriff and chief of police spouting the bullshit lines. Cops won't be safe and vigilante crap. Not once were they questioned about the states that already have it.
Animal Farm!!

Not only that, but TN has a bill moving through right now that removes the limits on public carry, meaning if you want to sling up an AK or a SPAS 12, you’re good if it passes. This may be limited to the car initially but they are seriously reducing restrictions at every point.


Edit: the bill removing rifles and shotguns from a carry prohibition was quashed yesterday. We lost that one for now.
 
Last edited:
Several decades ago, I saw a LEO friend and another cop using their vehicle as a barricade with shotguns pointed toward a closed bank.

I was carrying then and NOT a LEO. Besides that, I saw my friend and thought he might want some help. I stopped the vehicle, rolled the window down and asked if he needed help.

He said no as they were just conducting some training. I said goodbye and drove off.

About a week or so later, he thanked me for stopping and said it was comforting to know that their are people out there that would stop to help like that.

Would I do that today? Only if I knew the cop and he were a friend. I don't fear getting shot at by a bad guy as much as facing liability, or criminal charges, for helping a cop who might be using excessive force or targeting a good guy.

I back the blue as long as they support my 2A rights. If not, piss on them and stick their badge up their ass.
 
Why is LE such a shit magnet for short, fat, power hungry choads and lesbos?