I recently bought an Schmidt and Bender 3-20X56 with H2CMR reticle and have owned a 3-12X56 Hensoldt ZF with mildot reticle for over a year. I compared the two quite a bit this weekend, but I haven’t shot the S&B yet, so these are just my initial observations.
Hensoldt 3-12X56 FFP
Pros:
Exceptional clarity
Forgiving eye box and extremely easy and comfortable to get behind. Getting behind this scope is really kind of magical.
Great low light visibility - *very* slightly better than S&B (56mm vs. 50mm objective)
Compact
Tracks flawlessly
Turret knobs are easy to operate with smooth, positive, audible clicks
12 mils per turn
30 mils total elevation
Mil dot reticle is a good thickness and heavy outer bars help at low magnification, quick ranging scale.
Cons:
No zero stop (I created a "pseudo zero stop" by using 40 MOA of cant in the mount/rail - it bottoms out a few mils past zero, but I'd rather have it more centered optically)
No elevation turn indicator other than color-coded marks under turret cap
Limited reticle options - Mildot & NH1 (although it looks like the Horus H37 is now available)
Parallax adjustment is too subtle, so it takes some time to dial in exactly.
Illumination control is vague with no indication of status or setting
S&B 3-20X50 FFP
Pros:
Exceptional clarity
Great low light visibility (every so slightly less than the Hensoldt, but still excellent)
Tracks flawlessly (I’ll base this on other’s reports since I haven't shot it yet)
Pop-up indicator on elevation turret easily visible and tactile in low light (probably doesn't matter for my .308 - see next point)
13 mils per turn
26 mils total elevation
Locking turrets
“More Tactile Clilck” feature – I’ll list this as both a pro and a con. It’s nice to quickly feel the 1 mil division without looking or in low light, but hard to come out of the detent and not overshoot the first click. If it loosens up a little with time, it may be more useful. If it stays as hard as it is, it may be irritating.
H2CMR reticle is well laid out and is perfect above 5X. It’s a bit thin at 3-4X. Thick bars along the outside like the Hensoldt would have helped.
Many reticle options
Nice illumination adjustment with visual indication of setting
Parallax adjustment is quick and obvious
Cons:
Somewhat unforgiving eye box.
MTC feature hard to come out of the detent and not overshoot the first click
H2MCR reticle too thin at 3x, especially in certain lighting conditions. Could have made it perfect by adding thick outer bars.
The Hendsolt has by far the best eye box I’ve encountered. The sight picture is easy to acquire quickly and just feels comfortable, and the scope body almost disappears. The resolution of both scopes seems about equal. In some conditions, it seems the Hensoldt has the edge, but in others the S&B seems to take the lead. The S&B has more contrast and depth visually, along with a more natural color. The Hensoldt has a slightly warm cast (yellow-brown) and seems to flatten the image more. The Hensoldt FOV is superior, and it may have a slight edge-to-edge clarity lead.
Both scopes excel optically and are superior to my US Optics 1.8-10X44. The three features that for me give a slight edge to the S&B over the Hensoldt are 1) zero-stop, 2) reticle option, 3) 20x magnification for spotting or observing and 16x for certain shots. I think the Hensoldt is more elegant overall, and looks really good in a Near Alphamount! For now the S&B wins, but give the Hensoldt a zero stop and another reticle option, and it might get the edge.
Sidebar: the Near Alphamount is a work of art. Rock solid over time and perfectly machined. I removed the Hensoldt after a year and absolutely no ring marks, and that was with nothing done to the rings by me.
Hensoldt 3-12X56 FFP
Pros:
Exceptional clarity
Forgiving eye box and extremely easy and comfortable to get behind. Getting behind this scope is really kind of magical.
Great low light visibility - *very* slightly better than S&B (56mm vs. 50mm objective)
Compact
Tracks flawlessly
Turret knobs are easy to operate with smooth, positive, audible clicks
12 mils per turn
30 mils total elevation
Mil dot reticle is a good thickness and heavy outer bars help at low magnification, quick ranging scale.
Cons:
No zero stop (I created a "pseudo zero stop" by using 40 MOA of cant in the mount/rail - it bottoms out a few mils past zero, but I'd rather have it more centered optically)
No elevation turn indicator other than color-coded marks under turret cap
Limited reticle options - Mildot & NH1 (although it looks like the Horus H37 is now available)
Parallax adjustment is too subtle, so it takes some time to dial in exactly.
Illumination control is vague with no indication of status or setting
S&B 3-20X50 FFP
Pros:
Exceptional clarity
Great low light visibility (every so slightly less than the Hensoldt, but still excellent)
Tracks flawlessly (I’ll base this on other’s reports since I haven't shot it yet)
Pop-up indicator on elevation turret easily visible and tactile in low light (probably doesn't matter for my .308 - see next point)
13 mils per turn
26 mils total elevation
Locking turrets
“More Tactile Clilck” feature – I’ll list this as both a pro and a con. It’s nice to quickly feel the 1 mil division without looking or in low light, but hard to come out of the detent and not overshoot the first click. If it loosens up a little with time, it may be more useful. If it stays as hard as it is, it may be irritating.
H2CMR reticle is well laid out and is perfect above 5X. It’s a bit thin at 3-4X. Thick bars along the outside like the Hensoldt would have helped.
Many reticle options
Nice illumination adjustment with visual indication of setting
Parallax adjustment is quick and obvious
Cons:
Somewhat unforgiving eye box.
MTC feature hard to come out of the detent and not overshoot the first click
H2MCR reticle too thin at 3x, especially in certain lighting conditions. Could have made it perfect by adding thick outer bars.
The Hendsolt has by far the best eye box I’ve encountered. The sight picture is easy to acquire quickly and just feels comfortable, and the scope body almost disappears. The resolution of both scopes seems about equal. In some conditions, it seems the Hensoldt has the edge, but in others the S&B seems to take the lead. The S&B has more contrast and depth visually, along with a more natural color. The Hensoldt has a slightly warm cast (yellow-brown) and seems to flatten the image more. The Hensoldt FOV is superior, and it may have a slight edge-to-edge clarity lead.
Both scopes excel optically and are superior to my US Optics 1.8-10X44. The three features that for me give a slight edge to the S&B over the Hensoldt are 1) zero-stop, 2) reticle option, 3) 20x magnification for spotting or observing and 16x for certain shots. I think the Hensoldt is more elegant overall, and looks really good in a Near Alphamount! For now the S&B wins, but give the Hensoldt a zero stop and another reticle option, and it might get the edge.
Sidebar: the Near Alphamount is a work of art. Rock solid over time and perfectly machined. I removed the Hensoldt after a year and absolutely no ring marks, and that was with nothing done to the rings by me.