YesDoes that rifle shot sound suppressed?!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
YesDoes that rifle shot sound suppressed?!
crazy shit.The account @NajraGalvz, under the name Omar, made several posts on X (formerly Twitter), according to reports and screenshots shared on social media. Alleged posts from September 9, 2025, included a threatening message about hoping someone would "evaporate" Charlie Kirk and another stating that "something big will happen tomorrow". After Kirk's fatal shooting, further posts attributed to the account reportedly included phrases such as "Charlie Kirk got shot bro I promise I didn't have anything to do with it" and "But I called it and it's so f------ deserved".
Ummm…
You'd be flabbergasted to find out how many of those cameras aren't working. Seriously.There's cameras all over the place, and then cameras on nearby businesses, if they don't catch whomever did it they aren't trying.
Football is gay as hell, does anyone really watch that crap?Very unnecessary and very sad I hope they locate the shooter and HANGEM HIGH right before Monday night football from the goal post on the right side of the stadium
Mike R
Ya but they convinced a bunch of retards that AI isn't retarded, so they bel3ive the shit it cranks out.Lol...all the LLM's like chatgpt do is scrape the internet of all the mainstream positions on things so it pretty much regurgitates leftist/commie talking points
I know your not calling me a fag...Football is gay as hell, does anyone really watch that crap?
Sounds like a personal issue if hearing football called gay makes you a fag all the sudden lolI know your not calling me a fag...
Mike R
I did read it wrong my badSounds like a personal issue if hearing football called gay makes you a fag all the sudden lol
Why? Because this dates back all the way to the 60's in the height of the Cold War. Joe McCarthy was correct when he said our government was infiltrated at the highest levels. Communism crept into the American left, gained control of education, and used that to indoctrinate future generations. And what did we do? We called McCarthy a nut-job. Basically, we silenced Paul Reviere.My heart hurts, not for Charlie, his battle is over, his pain is no more, but I hurt for his two children, never having the opportunity to know their father.
Why so much hate?
Even in the Pre Civil War days, hate was not this deep and that includes John Brown and bloody Kansas and the Underground Railroad and the writings of Harriet Beecher Stowe.
Political controversy has been a part of our nation, for all my life, from the days of Harry Truman on till today, but today, it’s not controversy, it’s pure evil hate. Why? Why can’t people listen, talk and understand. Without this The ending is not going to be pretty.
They are not objective quotes. The very first one was Trump calling out Liz Chenny's war mongering in Ukraine. She calls for military action knowing she is never going to be the one staring down a barrel, which was his point, that you obviously can't understand, so there's nothing objective about that list. Ai is garbage in, and garbage out, and that list is full of garbage.Here is Grok’s response.
These are all objective quotes. It’s your fault if they get sand in your cooter.
Yeah, definitely a you problem it seems.Why don't you fuck yourself
I figuredHe read it wrong, all good.
Failed a mission?
View attachment 8765008
Bro, of all the people NOT to call a fag, Mike R is one of them.Sounds like a personal issue if hearing football called gay makes you a fag all the sudden lol
Shit, fuck, cunt!Judas priest dude, do you have Tourette’s? Damn, there is something seriously wrong going on with you.
I feel like maybe you’re having a brain aneurysm live and we should be calling emergency services.
That's not sand it's shoved in.To all those that think they aren’t in a Civil War with the left, pull your head out of the sand.
Civil Wars are usually 2 sided anywayThat's not sand it's shoved in.
Yup. The right keeps drawing a line in the sand and the left keeps busting through like the Kool-Aid Man. And what happens? We just draw a new line. It's sad.Civil Wars are usually 2 sided anyway
Most of my siblings fit comfortably in that group. I won’t threaten them, but I won’t trust them either. They happily support murder of those they disagree with.Yeah I know people on the left as well . While they might not call for murder their insane vilification of anything moral or conservative feeds this shit . They loose their fuckin minds over enforcement of law , keeping men out of women's locker rooms etc . Left of center these days is a mental illness .
Good point…
Good point…
I figured, but didn’t see the edit.I did read it wrong my bad
Mike R.
Again, it doesn’t matter the context. A politician running for the highest office in the land should not be alluding to violence to make their point. You wanna claim that MAGA isn’t violent and that the Dems are the most violent of us? Then take the high ground and don’t talk about responding to violence with violence?They are not objective quotes. The very first one was Trump calling out Liz Chenny's war mongering in Ukraine. She calls for military action knowing she is never going to be the one staring down a barrel, which was his point, that you obviously can't understand, so there's nothing objective about that list. Ai is garbage in, and garbage out, and that list is full of garbage.
My god you're a fucking moron. Must be from Reddit. This example is as simple as: Politician Cheney advocates for war. Response is, well, OK, you go to the front line. Your response: OMG! Advocating violence against Cheney!Again, it doesn’t matter the context. A politician running for the highest office in the land should not be alluding to violence to make their point. You wanna claim that MAGA isn’t violent and that the Dems are the most violent of us? Then take the high ground and don’t talk about responding to violence with violence?
That’s not an air tight argument the proper response to some violence is violence. that’s a general statement not towards this event in generalAgain, it doesn’t matter the context. A politician running for the highest office in the land should not be alluding to violence to make their point. You wanna claim that MAGA isn’t violent and that the Dems are the most violent of us? Then take the high ground and don’t talk about responding to violence with violence?
For anyone arguing about the shot placement
I watched the video and the bullet struck Charlie in the chest plate and the ricochet hit his neck.
The impact is clear, this wasn't some amazing professional shooter.
Him and/or Maxwell. At least one of them absolutely.Epstein was Mossad 100%. Planted to collect intel and blackmail material. I'll die on this hill. Kirk knew it and they killed him.