Re: Summer Carry- LCP or Bodygaurd
Down, just a thought, but this thread seems to be about you now and not the OP. They're looking to explore mousegun options and mentioned two possibilities. I countered with two more as possible options, and then they responded with the observation that they already have a small-frame, short barrel revolver but are looking for something in a small auto. Whaddaya say we help them towards that end?
(And frankly, 9mm Mak in a medium-size auto has nowhere near the ouch! factor of a 2" .38 with decent defense loads.)
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Downzero</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Veer G</div><div class="ubbcode-body">And it hurts for most people to shoot, even worse with Scandium parts, doesn't invite practice, is limited to five shots (J-frame specific), isn't as easy to reload ...
I use a Beretta Tomcat for such a purpose, but if I were looking for a smallish summer carry and didn't want a mouse gun, I'd probably scare up a S&W 3913. </div></div>
It does hurt to shoot. That's a function of it being 1. lightweight and 2. powerful. I've yet to shoot a .380 and/or 9x18 Mak that wasn't also painful to shoot. That's just how little guns are. If anything, the .380s are even worse.
A S&W 3913 isn't even in the same category. I usually carry a Springfield EMP, which is similar to the S&W 3913. The J-frame is for when I require a gun that fits in my pocket.
I agree that a 9mm Luger in single stack would be preferable, but even the smallest ones are not pocket guns. The J-frame is.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Breachers Up</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Right off the bat, I agree with you that the little revolvers are tried and true.
However, my reload time with a revolver speedloader - even if I actually trained and built up the muscle memory required- will never hold a candle to my reload time with a magazine fed weapon.
And also, revolvers are wider than the slim little autos, just by nature of having all the rounds in a circle (that revolves) rather than lined up one on top of the other in a magazine.
I have a snub nosed revolver and I wanna get one of the little pocket .380s for this purpose.
</div></div>
A .380 is never going to be the kind of "fighting" handgun you're expecting it to be. Your reload time is irrelevant. If you're fighting against something that requires a reload and all you have is a J-frame or a .380, you're already screwed.
You should seriously rethink your carry options and decide if you're willing to carry a pocket gun at all. No pocket gun combines high capacity, fast reloads, a slim design and a powerful cartridge.
You've made some very important points that should not be overlooked, but I think in the balance, the J frame wins. Having 7 rounds instead of 5 isn't a serious advantage, especially when they're weak rounds anyway. The profile is somewhat of an advantage when we're talking about pocket carry, but a pocket holster really goes a long way to break up the outline. Furthermore, while I normally wouldn't say this, a revolver is a more reliable for a gun that is going to live in your pocket, and will be less likely to clog with lint.
I hate shooting my j-frame, and I'm nowhere near as good with it as my EMP, so I carry the EMP if I can. But if I'm stuck with a pocket gun, I'd rather have five rounds of .38 Special than 7-8 rounds of .380.
I haven't shot the LCP or the Bodyguard, but if it were me, I'd buy whichever one was smaller, if I insisted on having a small automatic. A pocket pistol already involves a bunch of tradeoffs. You might as well get the smallest package--the one with the most benefit for all those tradeoffs--rather than acquire some feature you don't need anyway at the expense of a larger size or more weight.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: Here2Learn</div><div class="ubbcode-body">i have the LCP for summer carry and it seems to fill that role well. With that said, I am looking very hard at the LC9. The LC9 will also fit in my back pocket and it would be nice to have something with a little more punch. haven't every carried the BG so i cant really compare it to the LCP.
Also, look at Kel-Tec's version of the LC9. It appears to me to have a lighter trigger and i think it might be a little cheaper. </div></div>
These look like very promising options, but I fear that they're still too big for effective pocket carry. (The LC9 and similar) </div></div>