Re: Your Definition of a Sniper Rifle
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: kraigWY</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So does that mean that a sniper's rifle is only a sniper rifle when the sniper is actually shooting at a human?</div></div>
Again, this is silly. Here is another example.
I carried a "sniper rifle" (or as we called it a counter sniper rifle) in LE.
I got a call from the patrol LT telling me to respond to a certain area where they were looking for a dog. The dog in question was a stray that had bit a kid. They have been trying to catch this dog for three days. The doctor finely said, if the dog wasn't caught and tested before midnight, the kid would have to go through a series of rabie shots (quite painful).
The LT simply told me to go get the dog. I did. The dog was tested, no rabies and no rabie shot series.
So now tell me, this was a dog, not a human. So is my LE Sniper Rifle no longer a sniper rifle.
If I remember right when I was in sniper school we were taught that sniper targets could also be equipment, as in destroying radios and such. Or in LE, some "snipers' carry pellet guns to take out street lights and such. Wouldn't that also be a sniper rifle??????
Where does the "human only" bit come in.
Again this is silly, but I'll admit, entertaining. </div></div>
I agree it is silly. It is silly when someone tries to be something they are not. In law enforcment or military people are trained to use their rifles against equipment or peolpe to gain an advantage over someone or something? L.E. May include animals but isnt military primarally to gain the advantage over other peolpe, either by shooting the person or the equipment they may use?
They are using their rifles for the PURPOSE they were built.
The military does not have many precision rifles in a combat area to see if they can shoot small groups on paper.
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: kraigWY</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Quote:</div><div class="ubbcode-body">So does that mean that a sniper's rifle is only a sniper rifle when the sniper is actually shooting at a human?</div></div>
Again, this is silly. Here is another example.
I carried a "sniper rifle" (or as we called it a counter sniper rifle) in LE.
I got a call from the patrol LT telling me to respond to a certain area where they were looking for a dog. The dog in question was a stray that had bit a kid. They have been trying to catch this dog for three days. The doctor finely said, if the dog wasn't caught and tested before midnight, the kid would have to go through a series of rabie shots (quite painful).
The LT simply told me to go get the dog. I did. The dog was tested, no rabies and no rabie shot series.
So now tell me, this was a dog, not a human. So is my LE Sniper Rifle no longer a sniper rifle.
If I remember right when I was in sniper school we were taught that sniper targets could also be equipment, as in destroying radios and such. Or in LE, some "snipers' carry pellet guns to take out street lights and such. Wouldn't that also be a sniper rifle??????
Where does the "human only" bit come in.
Again this is silly, but I'll admit, entertaining. </div></div>
I agree it is silly. It is silly when someone tries to be something they are not. In law enforcment or military people are trained to use their rifles against equipment or peolpe to gain an advantage over someone or something? L.E. May include animals but isnt military primarally to gain the advantage over other peolpe, either by shooting the person or the equipment they may use?
They are using their rifles for the PURPOSE they were built.
The military does not have many precision rifles in a combat area to see if they can shoot small groups on paper.