Re: Your Definition of a Sniper Rifle
<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: a-hull</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mission_fail</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: a-hull</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: mission_fail</div><div class="ubbcode-body">The Marine Corps defines a sniper rifle as any rifle capable of holding a five shot group of 1 MOA or better. <span style="color: #FF0000">I use sniper and precision interchangeably</span>. It means the same thing to me. 1 moa capability. </div></div>
Any rifle that holds 1 moa? Where did you get that?
Then you use them wrong. </div></div>
Better run over to stone bay and correct the instructors there then. I'm with Kraig on this one in that it really doesn't matter. 1 moa capability is how I define a sniper rifle. A sniper rifle is a precision instrument. I don't care if someone else defines them as different, they're the same to me. </div></div>
A few questions for you.
1. Are you a saying you are a sniper?
2. Are you saying there is no difference between a rifle that is built for and used by the military for sniping and a rifle built for and used by a civilian?
3. Does an m16 during the v.m. war count as a precision rifle?
I ask if you are a sniper because if you are what you say would obviously carry more weight than what myself or a couple of dudes who are wannabies.
I also ask the other questions because i dont believe m.o.a. capability have any thing to do with a rifle being used for sniping. I think it has to do with a standard the marine corp has set for the rifles they use.
I also ask because if what you are saying is true then i can show you lots of rifles that can be sold as marine corp approved sniper rifles.
I also agree with kraig. But according to the wannabies on here, that would mean any m16 or hunting rifle, that has ever been used to "snipe" would count as a "sniper rifle."
But I disagree when civlians call a custom rifle they own a sniper rifle, that has never been used by a sniper, it is not even owned by a sniper, it has never been on a battle field or used by L.E. for sniping, or been used by a criminal to shoot people from a place of concealment.
Those rifles can accurately be described as alot of things, just not sniper rifle.
Oh yeah so the barrett .50 which is not a 1 moa rifle used by snipers for sniping is not a sniper rifle by the standard you stated? </div></div>
I was a scout sniper in 3/8 for two years. Graduated from class 2-10 out of stone bay. I just finished my contract so no, I'm not a sniper anymore. There are differences between military issue sniper rifles and civilian rifles. However if a civilian got the same parts and built a rifle to the same specs as a military issue sniper rifle then there would be no physical difference. If a vietnam era M16 held 1 MOA, it would be a precision rifle. Lots of rifles could be used with great effectiveness as issued rifles to snipers as long as they can hold the accuracy requirement. The reason the government doesn't let us use any rifle (even if accurate) is liability. They don't want somebody dying and then an accusation being made that it was because there was no regulation on his issued weapons, meaning the government is indirectly responsible. All current weapon systems are thoroughly evaluated before being fielded for active service.
Let's agree to disagree since we're both right. There is no authority on what defines sniper rifles. Different organizations define them differently as will people. My definition is mine. You can't say it's wrong because nothing supports you considering what I said is reasonable. It's my definition. Just like I can't say your definition is wrong, and I don't. My definition is what was taught to me and I agree with it and use it. It makes sense, it works, so it's good. This thread was for "<span style="text-decoration: underline">your</span> definition of a sniper rifle." As long as it's generally reasonable, it can't be ruled incorrect. Again I'm defining a sniper rifle from a capability standpoint. It does not pertain to ownership or actual purpose. A sniper's rifle would give the person owning the rifle the title of sniper. A person owning a sniper rifle says that person is in possession of a rifle capable of delivering precision fire according to the owner's definition.
And no, the M82A1 and the M107 are not sniper rifles as defined by scout snipers (2-3 moa average on both systems) even though snipers use them. They were designed for anti materiel use hence the name grouping special application scoped rifle (SASR) as opposed to special application sniper rifle.