Latest activity

Hot Threads

Latest activity

 Posts Forum list
 

Filter

CHINA WAR INEVITABLE...SOONER THAN LATER

Fig
ICC IS A FUCKING JOKE. Your arrogance is nothing next to those fucks we've sanctioned and barred from entering or owning a matchstick of the USA. Not even Obama or Biden were dumb enough to push on that rotting corpse. Leave that shit for African warlords to worry about. It's even more irrelevant than the UN or the WTO has become. When we just bypass them they don't matter. When we sanction them we're saying fuck you. It's really only a tool for the left to claim moral high ground because of all the shithole dictatorships who agree with their point of view and their critical theory.

I've said I think those institutions are broken and fundamentally flawed from their inception. Other than some window dressing on certain decisions I fail to see how any of those have driven any history or mattered at all. They certainly could have were they to exclude all countries and the cultures who are incapable of executing first principals (including in Europe), the very ones the RBIO claimed to champion.

Those institutions are bad because they betray their founding principals, not because they are true to them. How is that hard to understand?
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: W54/XM-388

Vortex Razor LHT

supercorndogs
Rob01 said:
It’s something that is useless unless you want to play mathematician. When you are laying behind your scope are you figuring out the apparent FOV? No. You see what you see. Seeing as this is the first I heard of this super important specification and never needed it to hit what I was aiming at then that will be filed under useless info for me. You have fun with your calculations 😆
Click to expand...
Apparent field of view let's you compare how big the image looks between scopes without having them in hand.

Your 8" phones screen has the same FOV as your 60" flat screen, and a 60ft Imax screen. 🤣🤣
Click to expand...
  • Like
Reactions: morganlamprecht and spife7980

Vortex Razor LHT

Rob01
spife7980 said:
Useless unless I want to play mathematicians… or, you know, be able to actually compare a scopes specs as experienced by the shooter.
Maybe you should go back to laying behind your scope instead of trying to offer advice on them since you can’t be bothered to learn about them.
Click to expand...

I will do that as it’s much more fun anyways. Never needed apparent FOV so I am sure I will be just fine. Sorry I tried to help him. I won’t again.
Click to expand...

Vortex Razor LHT

spife7980
Rob01 said:
It’s something that is useless unless you want to play mathematician. When you are laying behind your scope are you figuring out the apparent FOV? No. You see what you see. Seeing as this is the first I heard of this super important specification and never needed it to hit what I was aiming at then that will be filed under useless info for me. You have fun with your calculations 😆
Click to expand...
Useless unless I want to play mathematicians… or, you know, be able to actually compare a scopes specs as experienced by the shooter.
Maybe you should go back to laying behind your scope instead of trying to offer advice on them since you can’t be bothered to learn about them.
Click to expand...
  • Haha
Reactions: Rob01

Vortex Razor LHT

supercorndogs
koshkin said:
Real FOV is what the scope sees. Apparent FOV is Real FOV in degrees multiplied by magnification.

Apparent FOV determines is how big the image looks to your eye.

ILya
Click to expand...
That's what I wanted to know. Do both the LHT razors have a similarly smallish apparent field of view. Compared to the heavier scopes like the lrhs. Is it a function of the eye peice and ocular lens size also?
Click to expand...

Does anyone else get frustrated reloading

W
I've lived with shoulder bumps in a lot varying from 0.001 - 0.003" for years and just accepted rather than fret as my abilities are a much bigger constraint than any imagined precision difference from a couple thou shoulder bump.

I finally got the redding comp shell holder set and it does seem to help with consistent shoulder bumps when you're getting hard cam over.
Click to expand...

Vortex Razor LHT

Rob01
spife7980 said:
I’ll file that under willful ignorance.
Click to expand...

It’s something that is useless unless you want to play mathematician. When you are laying behind your scope are you figuring out the apparent FOV? No. You see what you see. Seeing as this is the first I heard of this super important specification and never needed it to hit what I was aiming at then that will be filed under useless info for me. You have fun with your calculations 😆
Click to expand...
Load more
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts