Someone murdered Charlie Kirk
- By mosin46
- The Bear Pit
- 5333 Replies
true that an individual can't usually manage direct input into a rep's actions. staff ignores you or blows it off as i have experienced myself. so,lobbying groups arise as a tool. they eventually become their own reason to exist.Well said. But it seems to me lobbying doesn't scale well. A lobby will always grow, and money (what makes them function) will always manipulate their actions...therefore, I'm saying the corruption is inherent in the process.
Do you think 100% transparency in funding is realistic? It would require politicians (trying to get rich) and lobbies (trying to make them rich) telling us exactly where all the money is coming from. Hiding the source of money is easier than hiding its existence all together.
Given the ease of communication today, could our representatives get back to actually speaking (phone, stream, town-halls in THEIR district/state, etc.) with their constituents instead of being busy getting wined, dined, vacationed, and their next campaign funded (another issue...term limits!) by said perpetually-corrupted lobbies leveraging their greed and desire to stay in office?
The first struggle is obviously finding a moral and ethical non-psychopath to elect...which highlights the real issue, that you and I are discussing subtle differences in fighting symptoms of the same disease.
they themselves become highly corrupt and come to exist for their own enrichment. the NRA is a perfect example of this process. my father was a life member since the late 40s,me an endowment for decades. we all know how much they syphoned off thru plain theft,many 6 figure salaries. this is a common route with any lg lobbying group. they steal the $s instead of using it to pressure congress on our behalf. the big ones just buy congress blobs like Warren and Johnson. the lobby blob just becomes an integral part of the DC sewer and system and stays all joined in the corruption game.