Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have that pussy speak about good ole mohhamed like that and see what happens
Well said, and I have to say, I've not been this excited in a long time.The High End .22lr World is becoming about as exciting as the race to MARS by SpaceX. It keeps building up, new stuff everywhere, the old, good stuff falling by the wayside.
And I can’t wait, to see it all work out.
(In my case, time is of the essence, its not critical, but I like to think in months, as years are passing so darn fast).
View attachment 8682109
Was never interested in "The Devil's 3-Way" but had no idea The Devil's 4-Way would be so tempting.
What color are the pads? I had the greens on my last truck & really liked them, minimal brake dust & improved stopping of course (I had slotted rotors as well but doubt that made a big difference)... I'll put them on my current ¾ ton as soon as that project gets to the top of the list.Why do people insist on putting on garbage tail lights? I sincerely dislike aftermarket assemblies like these.
View attachment 8682065
Good thing the Summit Racing fairyarrived
View attachment 8682066
View attachment 8682067
These are the EBC pads which they say are more better-er for trucks with larger tires. So, we'll see. The stock rotors/pads ain't cutting it for me.
Very well stated....Sorry, late to the party, but I will bite.
Innovation is being creative AND methodical to make accuracy and precision converge to meet the targeted goal (pun intended).
Incremental change is working from a base design and making small improvements/refinements to achieve a goal (maybe cost, maybe precision or accuracy or both) to differentiate from the competition and claim "its better". Sometimes, it addresses a deficiency in the current design or flaw found in actual use, but is usually mislabeled as innovation (sometimes haters call it "a solution looking for a problem").
Revolution is an approach that some would consider "radical" that changes or elevates a design to a whole new platform or way of thinking or operating that doesn't care to address minor flaws or issues, but is tired of working a problem the same ol conventional way of thinking and addresses it without accepting constraints that would limit how one would approach making a system manage precision and accuracy in a very predictable way to achieving a new level of performance.
Yes, provided it's not all about the spring and other key features are addressed appropriately. The operating dynamics throw a whole new set of problems into the mix along with the characteristics of what's being fed, as in design of the case (protruding or rebated rim, taper, and so on).Would it not be possible to size the spring appropriately? Surely a constant force spring that has less force at minimum stack (one round) than a wound spring at full stack could still have enough force to feed reliably. Especially with lightweight rounds such as 22.
I've been replying pretty much as they come in, did you not receive a response?Should we expect an email response to our small parts queries now or at a later date?