Filter

I think I found my new scope

I’m tempted to do it, just to make you guys throw up in your mouth a little bit.

Only hesitation is I don’t know if I want those shady bastards to have any of my personal info or credit card.

I’ll get a gift card maybe, and buy one.

Then do accuracy testing in my AI and an M4.

Then leave a glowing review on their site that will look like it was written by a bot using incorrect terminology for everything.
Make sure you get “verified purchaser” by your review
  • Like
Reactions: DM1975

7mm SAW

Thanks. Was thinking of starting with RL15 and tac and maybe tinkering with 4831. Have plenty of varget and h4350 if it doesn’t pan

Anyone have some leftover 145 lrx or 150 ABLRs they tried and aren’t using? Can’t bring myself to pay that much for test boxes when I have a pile of 150 eldx already
145LRX and varget has been a very accurate combo for me. They just need more jump that the ELD
  • Like
Reactions: shlouf

Accessories Tikka XLR 4.0 MG chassis

Like new Tikka XLR 4.0 MG chassis only. I could add a straight carbon non folder and carbon grip for the right deal. Looking to trade but will sell the bare chassis for $500.
Trades are Manners EH1 or LHR for a tikka can add cash if needed
Leupold MK5HD 3.8-18 Tremor 3 or H59
Salmon River 6.5 Pro 4 Titanium
Will consider other trades

Attachments

  • IMG_7191.jpeg
    IMG_7191.jpeg
    689.3 KB · Views: 71
  • IMG_7190.jpeg
    IMG_7190.jpeg
    711.5 KB · Views: 67
  • Like
Reactions: Surdez1994

Rifle Scopes Razor gen 3 upgrade

Did ZCO fix the illumination (and did they whack you or was the price fair) is what we need to know..?
I'm really wanting to know this. What a company is legally bound to do vs what they will do actually says a lot about them to me.

Vortex gen 3 scopes cost significantly less to manufacture. In fact, Vortex can afford to replaced them a few times and still break even.
This is likely a bit more due to the cost of manufacture in Japan vs Europe. Compare the prices of grand pianos from Yamaha and Shigeru Kawai to Hamburg Steinway, Fazioli, and Petrof, and you'll see similar cost differences. Same with Seiko watch movements and ETA movements from Europe.

I still think the ZCO is likely better designed and made, but the ease of replacement is likely more due to geographical costs. I bet ZCO could do the same if they made their scopes out of Japan too, and the quality wouldn't be wildly different.

Rifle Scopes Razor gen 3 upgrade

Fair.

Vortex is so good with their customer service and warranty stuff, that with everyone else it can almost seem like we're getting less for our money (sometimes, even when spending more).

That said, Vortex probably sells, IDK, maybe ~200,000? more scopes than companies the size of operations like ZCO or Tangent Theta.

The "alpha glass" Co's are a niche of a niche, cream of the crop fancy rifile shit for guys already deep in the rabbit hole lol, but they're ants compared to a boot-size company like Vortex who sells like 10,000 shitty red dots + 1000 Diamondback/Strike Eagle tier scopes + 20 Razors for every scope one of these smaller fancy-pants outfits move. So CS shit should be great, since they can afford it (and it appears they can judging by the free hats and stickers and shit I've received when dealing with them lol).

Economy of scale, I guess..?

I'm not trying to be an apologist for ZCO because I have/run one either, but I can wrap my head around why a smaller company wouldn't front you a shipping label if the issue is known to be outside the warranty, is all.

Leupold CS jerked me around and made me get a little loud to get a pre-paid shipping label out of them on a fresh out of the plastic scope... so clearly company-mindset and how companies choose to act matters as well.

Did ZCO fix the illumination (and did they whack you or was the price fair) is what we need to know..?
I agree with everything you say in your post, and for the same reasons.

I'm not a Vortex fanboy, nor am I bashing ZCO. All I wanted to do is point out the written warranty differences and my experience with each brand. I've owned or still own at least a dozen Vortex scopes... there are three gen-3 Razors in my safe and I just bought a Strike Eagle 3-18x44 to stick on an AR - in no small part because of all the discounts to be had on Vortex optics, but also because they just get the job done for a very competitive price and... warranty.

To answer your question re illumination: I didn't send the scope in. I actually called about doing so not because of illumination but because my rifle fell off my cart about two feet onto a gravel drive after 2nd stage at a match. I missed a number of targets I should have hit afterward, so I wondered if I had damaged it (negligence!).

I just didn't get a good feeling during and after that call, so I took no action. The illumination kinda sorta works; it's just not bright enough to use on shaded targets in full sun and batteries die pdq. And I discovered that I had used my .223 calculator profile during the match, which is pretty darn close to the 6BR profile under 600-700 yards :rolleyes:. The scope's tracking was and is fine.

It may well be that ZCO would have taken care of illumination gratis had I sent it in.

DBD is right about the thinner optic of the gen-3 Razor (compared to ZCO 527) being a disadvantage in some circumstances. For that exact reason, I swapped the ZCO from my 6BR to my Vudoo .22, and the Vudoo's Razor went to the 6BR. Works better.
  • Like
Reactions: CK1.0

Rifle Scopes Razor gen 3 upgrade

ZCO is a European company (made there atleast) and as such, there are restrictions on what they can do in writing. What they "Claim" and what they actually do aren't the same thing.

I have known a ton of people (myself includes) who have warrantied Vortex, ZCO and TT scopes. Every time it has been similar. Easy process, quick turnaround.

Vortex gen 3 scopes cost significantly less to manufacture. In fact, Vortex can afford to replaced them a few times and still break even. Think about that for a minute. This is direct from one of their most well known sponsored shooters.

ZCO is a much smaller company, with a smaller product line and what I assume is, much lower margins. Its also a significantly better product overall.

I have never had to pay for shipping to ZCO and honestly, if I got to pay $30-50 to ship a $4000 optic to get repaired, I and anyone else who has one can afford it. It doesn't move the needle. Unless bitching about non material differences is the goal.

I don’t think he said the ZCO warranty was bad, just not equally as painless as the Vortex.

Vortex Impact 4000 Cold Weather Issues

I dunno about that man (but it should work fine for @hafejd30 in the summer). Perhaps they used them early in the war, but check this out. I wrote about it and also posted a link to the YT vid.


Login to view embedded media
Sounds like using any optic over there is risky and requires an ARD. Shooting a civi laser around would also seem to be like hoisting a big “kill me” flag over your head.

I’m no military guy, but 🤷‍♂️
Excellent video. Times change. Technology changes but goal is the same
  • Like
Reactions: carbonbased

Rifle Scopes Razor gen 3 upgrade

I've been really thinking about upgrading my razor gen 3 but not sure if it's worth the squeeze. Richard from CST pointed me in the direction of the zco527. This is a lot of money to me to drop on a scope so I figured I would ask the hide there opinions and people who have both or have the higher end of scopes. I've been around ATACR and looked threw a zco 5 years ago for like 1 min so I have no experience.

I shoot elr style matches that's it. I like the razor gen 3 but this is the only rifle I own and so I figured I mine as well have the best I can can since I'm limited to 1.
What distances are you shooting? Are you competitive now? Are you wanting to win more often? And can I ask what you shot before the G3 Razor?