I took this guy last week with a Hornady 140 BTHP from my 6.5 PRC. Shot was about 430 yards, through both lungs.

ironman56 said:

Imagine that , the Amish first claimed that it was police brutality, and he was a good boy , idiot probably felt 10 ft tall and bulletproof because he had a pistol , typical hood rat behavior.

Click to expand...

They are very quickly becoming aware that they're no longer untouchable.

Baron23 said:

@AccuSol-ERN - I got a beautiful BA from you a few years ago. Deviant and a Bartlein blank I sent you. What torque do you use on a barrel install?

@MikeRTacOps - yeah…not bc asking for your secret sauce, but do you torque your barrels to at least 100 ft/lbs or greater?

Thanks

Click to expand...

Remington 700's between 500 and 800
Surgeon 591's min. 350
Any other custom actions 300 to 450

Red Ryder BB guns hand tight

Mike R

Tokay444 said:

And patently wrong. The screw doesn't touch the barrel.

Click to expand...

Where are you seeing a screw?

bumop

added another LW 1.250 12 twist at 24"

Impact barrels will fit in lone peak fuzions but barrels chambered for lone peak fuzions will not have the clearance for the bolt Face of an impact. The counterbore is about .010 longer on the impact barrels. Some smiths barrels may fit both but it is not a guarantee.

Rubicon Precision said:

But it does flex, and is not rigid. There is clearance.

Click to expand...

I said it's not floating. Floating and flexing are different. The way you have it drawn the thread wedge can move forward and aft in the joint without any significant load applied. In the action the ears must flex through significant preload applied by the locking screw. That load is translated into joint preload on the entire joint. The important factor in that setup is the ears have the same thread position that the rest of the tenon has. This means that when the ear flexes inward the timing of the thread flank doesn't change initially but rather once the screw load is applied to fold the ear into the threads. As the ear comes into contact with the barrel threads it moves as the driving contact on the barrel male thread. The tighter you make the screw the more force it applies to the ear, the farther the ear's thread drives towards the barrel and those threads form a ramp that effectively closes the PD down on the joint.

Since the joint is stationary against the shoulder plane the change in PD creates axial load due to the change in radial load. That axial load is the preload we're talking about being applied and acts just like torque to the joint.

All of this is because the ear does not move axially in the joint without significant load applied to it. It's not like a floating thread wedge like you might find in a locking ring on a Redding die body.

Tokay444 said:

Then no, your drawing is wrong. It’s not a set screw on the barrel. There’s slit in the action and the screw passes under the barrel, clamping the slit on the threads.

Click to expand...

Yeah, no shit. I missed where I depicted a set screw. Drawing was in its most simplistic form.

TTT

Rubicon Precision said:

The flank may be loaded by the torque of hand tightening, BUT mechanism in the AWMC does not increase the tension in the joint.

If you put pressure at the arrow onto the chingadera, will it increase the pressure beteeen the barrel shoulder and receiver face, decrease it, or stay the same?
View attachment 8787122

Click to expand...

Most of the receiver is threaded normally(fixed), any squeeze by the clampc which is closing at the 6 oclock position, puts additional load on the already loaded flank. This is where the tensile load comes from. Its pulling the shoulder into the receiver face.

Tokay444 said:

Mind posting a link, or even a pic of something called an, “AWMC”?

Click to expand...

Sorry, AXMC…

You are aware that show was staged right?

bohem said:

The pressure at the shoulder increases. The wedge drives the barrel rearward and provides additional load into the shoulder.
The piece you're calling the chingadera isn't floating in the action. It's cut as a single unit to the receiver body and they have an H shaped cut that allows for the ears of the tab to flex. This means that the loaded flank continues to be the loaded flank and drive additional load into the shoulder face.

Click to expand...

But it does flex, and is not rigid. There is clearance.

Tokay444 said:

That's not what's happening in the action. Your drawing is incorrect.

Click to expand...

That’s exactly what’s happening an an AWMC.

If not, I welcome your drawing.

Rubicon Precision said:

The flank may be loaded by the torque of hand tightening, BUT mechanism in the AWMC does not increase the tension in the joint.

If you put pressure at the arrow onto the chingadera, will it increase the pressure beteeen the barrel shoulder and receiver face, decrease it, or stay the same?
View attachment 8787122

Click to expand...

The pressure at the shoulder increases. The wedge drives the barrel rearward and provides additional load into the shoulder.
The piece you're calling the chingadera isn't floating in the action. It's cut as a single unit to the receiver body and they have an H shaped cut that allows for the ears of the tab to flex. This means that the loaded flank continues to be the loaded flank and drive additional load into the shoulder face.

Im2bent said:

Were those ticket prices directly though the venue or ticket scalpers.......I mean "brokers"?

Click to expand...

I need to look deeper, I’m not sure

Edit: stub hub is about 250 to thousands, but about 1/2 what I saw in the first site. This is all pre-sales

just bought this kit from eurooptic. very nice glass and definitely daylight-bright center dot. will go on a 14.5" that i may use occasionally in 2 & 3 gun. love my original non-e 1-6 with the jm-1 reticle on my primary 2/3 gun AR.

Oil & gas is not made from dinosaur or any other vertebrate animal remains. It’s primarily comprised of phytoplankton and plant matter, pelagic ooze type stuff that has carpeted the oceans for hundreds of millions of years. Gets buried, compressed, trapped in rock. There is and never was enough biomass in dinosaurs for it. Now in the amount of microscopic sea and plant life…for sure there is plenty enough .
Yes, I’m a professional geologist of 21 years now.
O&G as we currently know and use from the CMB? No. Abiotic synthesis at CMB depths may produce some bound methane states like on Neptune etc due to massive pressures, but it’s not the same as in crude reservoirs at current exploitable depths. And you’d never get to it. It’s about 1,800 miles down. Deepest we’ve ever drilled is 12 miles. Good luck.