Official (DTA) SRS, HTI, Covert, Hunter Thread
- By richthe1
- Bolt Action Rifles
- 17757 Replies
True, I just prefer a co-linear top rail so I can have the option to attach a clip-on on the same plane.Or just get a one peice 30 moa scope mount.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell us about the best or most memorable shot you’ve ever taken. Contest ends June 13th and remember: subscribe for a better chance of winning!
Join contest SubscribeTrue, I just prefer a co-linear top rail so I can have the option to attach a clip-on on the same plane.Or just get a one peice 30 moa scope mount.
Notice there was no warfare in Donbas prior to 2014? Weird, right?are you denying the slaughter of ethnic russian civilians in the donbas for years prior to the response from putin?
how many died as a result of our invasions of iraq and afghanistan, and our funding of terrorists in syria?
how many of those dead people had anything to do with 9/11?
I’ve literally been calling out USAID before most people had even heard of it, and before most here were ever born.maybe he was trained by usaid?
The reason for a larger magazine envelope in a centerfire sized receiver is to properly handle feed timing. It has been proven in many instances that small form factor 22LR magazines have been unreliable in a receiver diameter of 1.350". This is why Remington was not successful at making a reliable 40X Rimfire repeater.I have often thought the the problem with R700 mags in a 22 was simply their size. They are too big and any misalignment or pressure was amplified. Why not make an action with a mag block that fits into an R700 action? It would allow one to use any magazine design with optimized tolerances and limit the effects of the any out of spec. chassis system.
Ha ha! Nobody feeds me anything. Maybe some projection is going on.nah,i think he is an American. is typical of those acoytes that worship at the feet of the MIC,deep state and profit from same. the breadth of his info and data,while likely open source,is far too broad reaching for any casual fool on here like most of us to chase down. he is no doubt fed the data which are mostly lies contains large amounts of truth as per normal in this type of propoganda. just a bit too smug and self touching to be real effective. he over does it in the condesention dept and dispensing of his gems of knowledge. much more euridite and seemingly real than 2 or 3 others around lately that are just obviously Ukrainian trolls.
The Saudi nationals were purposely-selected by the Muslim Brotherhood to make the US think it was Saudis doing it, to try to break up the US-Saudi alliance. Read more.correct meant billions to Ukraine. should have been $20.00. OUR DEBT IS TRILLIONS. but like i said you neocons can get more with inventing a new boogey man. so,fuck America and it's rotting infrastucture,disfunctional schools,legions of homeless and poisoned land. i mean,maybe the VC will threaten to invade again like Johnson said they could in "65. so the money WAS spent and profit WAS made. so,getting them off inventory sending them to Ukraine with (free) transport cost us nothing? the MIC replaced them free? your claim that Europe has sent much to Ukraine is denied many places and make a much better case than you have.. Saudi,Germany,UK,Australia are top industrialized nations with large militaries? are you kidding? Australia has no enemies except likely China. they gonna protect themselves from that? noooo that is another one for us to protect,with BTW,a fair amount of reason to do so. we are stuck with Saudi,despite most terrorists attacking us have been Sunnis being being funded thru them and Qatar. 9/11ers were Saudis not Iraquis. i guess you think that invasion was a good deal for us? look how good the end game was. we can deal with Saudi because we have to being tied up with them with oil. doesn't sound much like you mind spending big $ on Fascist regiemes Australia,UK,Germany and a big YES Ukraine are now are at least as bad in Germany 1940. i have to wonder whether they are worth dealing with at all educate yourself on what is going in those places and the rest of w.Europe. sounds like you believe Putin wants to conquer all of Europe. i just see no evidence that he wants to or really could. he can't possibly be stupid as Obama,Miley,Biden,Bush 2,Clinton,Austin,Graham,Mcconnel,so many,many more. he is corrupt but not even close to Clinton and Obiden.
wonder if you have sons,or daughters even. if so,you gonna be happy to send them off to die or get maimed for the likes of Ukraine or anywhere else in Europe? you war mongers are all happy to get other people's kids killed for the God of showing how great your delusions are. of course you think you will help the deep state attain great military glory with no shedding of Americn blood.
that shit hasn't had a thing to do do with defending America since probably the mid/late 19th century.
Guess who obstructed Congress from investigating the real perpetrators of 9/11?Pakistani ISI General Mahmud Ahmed was meeting with Congressman Goss as the first plane struck the WTC. Thirty minutes after the second plane hit, Ahmed was being chauffeured along Constitution Avenue in Washington when smoke from the Pentagon became visible.[1] Then, astonishingly, Goss showed up at the Pentagon too, and he spoke to reporters only minutes after a plane reportedly hit that building.[2]
The Goss-Ahmed meeting is interesting due to the Pakistani ISI’s history with the CIA in funding and arming the “Afghan Arabs” from which al Qaeda evolved. The meeting even included discussion of Osama bin Laden, who was allegedly striking at the heart of the very capital where the attendees met.
Ahmed has been linked to accused 9/11 paymaster Omar Saeed Sheikh, and has been suspected of ordering Sheikh to wire money to Mohamed Atta before the attacks.[3] Although the latter accusation has been challenged, it seems to be an unusual coincidence that the leader of the Pakistani ISI would be present as al Qaeda’s historic attack was taking place. Ahmed’s meeting with Goss is also remarkable in light of Goss’ history as a CIA operative.
Goss was a ten-year veteran of the CIA’s clandestine operations. Later, as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, he was responsible for most of the intelligence abuses that were identified by the 9/11 Commission investigation. Regardless of this fact, it was Goss who replaced George Tenet as DCI after Tenet resigned. As DCI, Goss continued the obstruction of the 9/11 investigations and facilitated the crimes that were committed in the name of 9/11.
Because he led the first investigation into 9/11, Goss should have been above reproach, but he was far from it. In fact, his history as a deep state operative, his proximity to the alleged hijackers, and his behavior during the investigations suggest that he might have had a role in the attacks.
The only presented evidence (of anything) in this whole thread is:I’m not sure what your point is, but HR6352 -Tax Stamp Revenue Transfer bill is not the same as the Constitutional Hearing Protection Act, formerly HPA.
HR6352 just looked to reduce the tax stamp cost to the consumer. So of course all suppressor companies would support it as it would increase sales. Yet it still made them remain fully on the NFA. A good thing for current manufacturers.
The Constitutional Hearing Protection Act as introduced would have removed them completely from NFA. Making them essentially another firearm commodity.
Not a good thing for current manufacturers.
If you cannot see the difference…
ETA: the revisions to CHPA coming out of committee amount to essentially the same thing as your referenced HR6352. It looks to reduce the cost to consumers. Thus satisfying those that want to keep them on the NFA, like say SC. And also satisfying those congressmen that would just like to get the pressure off of them from their constituents.
This compromise would likely accomplish both those things while pretty much keeping the status quo in DC and satisfying the huge lobbying groups from both sides.
Who loses? John Q. Public, that’s who.