No guns for trannies?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fx51LP308

Fx51LP308

Old Salt
Full Member
Minuteman
    • Apr 8, 2021
    3,582
    5,282
    Tampa Bay, FL
    #1
    Per Newsmax, The DOJ is pushing directives, perhaps legislation, that would restrict the sale/possession etc. etc. of guns to those who are "Gender dysphoric." That is, they identify as transgender. This, after the last two violence incidents where the assailants identified as Transgender and committed the crimes, at least in part, based on that identity.

    Thoughts? I have my own, but I'll get y'all's take on it first.

    Edit: It's the DOJ that's spearheading the effort... not Pres. Trump directly.
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: CCISERTDAWG and Itsadryheat
    #6
    Redlion said:
    While lefty loonies such as some radical trans are dangerous, call me old fashion when it comes to the 2nd amendment. "Shall not be infringed." Give an inch and they will take a mile. Not much of a leap for politicians to go from trannies to combat veterans with PTSD.
    Click to expand...

    Precisely my own initial thought. If they can do this to transgenders that do not exhibit any "evil intent," they can do it to law abiding gun owners and others like veterans, etc.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: LuckyLuke80, Makinchips208, oneshot86 and 4 others
    #8
    Devildog said:
    If people want to kill others they will always find a way. No law will stop it. Bring back looney bins!!
    Click to expand...

    I've actually heard some chatter about that, as well, this week. I lived 1/2 hour away from one for a bit. Greystone Park Psychiatric Hospital, in Morris County, NJ. I think they should bring them back, as well as a temporary facility for people accused of being a danger to themselves or others. In this way, we get them out of the house and away from their guns for the period needed to determine their status. Then the authorities need not confiscate any guns from that house. No Red Flag laws needed!
     
    • Like
    Reactions: 1911hombre
    #11
    IMG_1493.jpeg
     
    • Like
    • Haha
    Reactions: NoDopes, Beefmanne, TheHorta and 15 others
    #14
    I guarantee that they'll go after combat vets with PTSD regardless. We're just a generation (at max) away from that legislation getting voted on.

    1. The NICS was denying sales for "Have you ever been adjucated as a mental defective OR..." a long time ago. I don't see the stretch between someone claiming to be a member of the opposite sex so persistently that they'll mutilate their own bodies (via surgery or hormones) - and a person who sits on a park bench and violently tries to attack clouds.

    2. I still believe that " shall not be infringed" means exactly that. However, since we have a gub'ment that both infringes as well as fails to control the mentally unstable... You have a worst of both worlds situation. Therefore, I take it upon myself to carry adequate means to defend my family, regardless of what is written on paper somewhere. The only exception, is to a location where there are active detection devices, and armed police. I look at my safety as a me thing, but unfortunately I know that I'll be prosecuted to the fullest for protecting it. I've psychologically prepared myself for that rude awakening already. And I've LLC'd the ranch and clinic seperately as well.

    I would probably cheer for a moment if our gub'ment took a step to controlling the mentally unstable's access to weaponry... but it wouldn't last long because I know that those same laws would be weaponized against me within a few years. So no joy there.

    So do what feels right to you... vote harder... and maybe perhaps carry your own veto stamp appendix style or whatever fits you best. You're F-ed, and nobody is coming to save you.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: FWoo45, LMTMWS, diverdon and 6 others
    #15
    I disagree with thd whole tranny lifestyle, but unless they are spending time in a mental facility they should have the same rights as any other normal , legal American.

    Tranny or not, you started sending rounds be prepared fir a 2 way range.

    This is a slippery slope to make every single person owning a gun to make them take a psych evaluation. And who are the fucks deciding if we are psycho or not, I dont trust any of them .
     
    • Like
    Reactions: armorpl8chikn, MO Fugga, MCHOG and 6 others
    #19
    Easy enough.

    Pass a law declaring gender dysphoria is a mental illness that requires a person suffering it to be adjudicated as mentally incompetent. Require them to be committed to mental institutions to be treated. Obviously no gun ownership. We should probably add quite a few mental conditions to this list of mandatory confinement to mental institutions. Make nut houses great again!

    We can add a bunch of useful new laws that would make society better. Maybe a constitutional amendment allowing cruel and unusual punishment for certain crimes. Hell make it mandatory. Public torture and executions for child molesters, rapists, and murderers for example…. wood chipper feet first, burning at the stake, boiling alive, flaying, impaling, drawing and quartering, breaking on the wheel, gibbetting. Whole bunch of suitable punishments. Make the condemned choose their painful way out, or choose for them.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Jack's Dad and Camelfilter
    #23
    akmike47 said:
    Go fuck yourself
    View attachment 8760683

    You’re part of exactly what’s wrong with this country. Go back to not posting you dumb cunt
    Click to expand...

    I don’t believe in rehabilitation for child predators, sex predators, or murderers.

    Not a fan of paying to keep them alive either.

    How about public hanging?

    Or are you pro-kiddie touching or something? I don’t regard them as human, they’re worse than animals and deserve every last ounce of pain they can be given.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: stevieb92
    #25
    Shall not be infringed.

    You’re a mental patient that hasn’t done anything unspeakable. You gotta stay in the rubber room until you can make sense.

    Got all your faculties but you did something dumb but not evil get out (ETA for clarification: of prison) and get your guns.

    You’re an evil sonofabitch that we can’t trust whatsoever? Hang your fucking ass in the town square.
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: RUN8
    #26
    Amazing how fast our folks will ditch shall not be infringed and due process like good little cucks.

    Gun owners are the biggest dick sucking pussies out there. Utterly fucking embarrassing.

    You, and anyone you love, is more likely to die from a bee sting than being shot by a god damn tranny.

    The shame of being part of this demographic sometimes is just barely tolerable. And I mean barely.

    We are at fucking WAR here. This is not a discussion! This is about moving the line. The other-side wants us DEAD.

    First we get the BBC rammed up our backsides and now republicans want to pass gun control. What the actual fuck is wrong with you people!

    FORTIFY OUR SCHOOLS (like we do banks and airports)
    REPEAL GUN FREE ZONES
    ARM TEACHERS
    REOPEN MENTAL INSTITUTIONS
    NATIONAL CONCEALED CARRY
     
    • Like
    Reactions: LuckyLuke80, armorpl8chikn, oneshot86 and 10 others
    #27
    AMERICAN_FANTASY_REALITY.png


    We’re only cocksure and cavalier in saying that when we’re soooooo certain that “we” aren’t at all like “them.”

    Waiting for that “slippery slope” figure of speech to pop up
    LAUGHTER_25.gif
     
    Last edited:
    • Like
    Reactions: LuckyDuck
    #29
    I'm no fan of transformers and especially not with the rhetoric that they tried to introduce to our children on the topic. And I stand by those beliefs.

    That said- this is too slippery of a slope and if even enacted as sold, bet your bottom dollar that the pendulum will shift as fast as the next administration.

    Shall not be infringed. I can't think of 4 words more strongly worded and more often nitpicked by pencil neck... individuals looking to find nuance in a principle that leaves no room for debate. And yes- I also extend that to ex-prisoners, even murders.

    It's a fallacy to say that we release prisoners because they've "repaid their debt to society" & they're "rehabilitated" but also deny them constitutional rights after release. And many of those that support this also believe in the merits of these rights being inalienable (aka 'god given') don't seem to believe that applies when a judge says 'nah'.

    I could go on but I'll stop there. Point is- while I find Trannies need people to stop catering to their fantasy world and need mental help- rights are rights and playing cheifton selecting who gets said rights is a path I don't ever want to go down.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Fx51LP308, AmmoFort and TACC
    #31
    Fx51LP308 said:
    Per Newsmax, Pres. Trump is pushing directives, perhaps legislation, that would restrict the sale/possession etc. etc. of guns to those who are "Gender dysphoric." That is, they identify as transgender. This, after the last two violence incidents where the assailants identified as Transgender and committed the crimes, at least in part, based on that identity.

    Thoughts? I have my own, but I'll get y'all's take on it first.
    Click to expand...
    And just like that, all the liberals are pro 2a.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: stefan73 and LuckyDuck
    #32
    RUN8 said:
    I don’t believe in rehabilitation for child predators, sex predators, or murderers.

    Not a fan of paying to keep them alive either.

    How about public hanging?

    Or are you pro-kiddie touching or something? I don’t regard them as human, they’re worse than animals and deserve every last ounce of pain they can be given.
    Click to expand...
    Typical fag with no real argument so you go off on an unrelated rant to try and save face.

    IMG_1416.jpeg

    Apparently understanding replies to specific quotes is hard for the retarded. Nothing you said has anything to do with making new laws and amendments stupid cunt lol
     
    Last edited:
    • Wow
    Reactions: LuckyDuck
    #35
    akmike47 said:
    Typical fag with no real argument so you go off on an unrelated rant to try and save face.

    View attachment 8760725
    Apparently understanding replies to specific quotes is hard for the retarded. Nothing you said has anything to do with making new laws and amendments stupid cunt lol
    Click to expand...

    Uh huh.

    I’ll assume at this point you must be into touching little kids.

    Hopefully there’s a wood chipper in your near future if so.
     
    #37
    RUN8 said:
    Uh huh.

    I’ll assume at this point you must be into touching little kids.

    Hopefully there’s a wood chipper in your near future if so.
    Click to expand...
    Typical no argument faggot throwing wild accusations lol. You don’t need to be laws for pedos, you just get rid of them you pro-authoritarian bitch.

    You
    IMG_1437.jpeg


    Apparently you’re so fucking stupid you need laws to tell you fucking kids is bad because you can’t come to the conclusion on your own
     
    Last edited:
    #39
    I'm more of a fan of knocking off the bullshit prosecution and intentional financial ruin by a scum-sucking DA - of those who legally defend themselves. Reimburse that grand jury lawyer cost to the defendant with the money saved in "entitlements" to the deceased (unrealistic). Or better (and more realistically) yet, have the defendant costs of those "L"s that go to the DA come out of their annual budget.

    I also believe that any CIVILIAN who is cleared criminally of a defensive use of force should be free of civil suit - nationwide. Some states those civil suits are akin to winning the 'section 8 lottery' for the deceased's family.

    I'm extremely blessed that there are teachers who are armed in all of our local schools (I was one), and that we have constitutional carry laws here. That isn't a guarantee for safety at all... but those are extra layers of defense.

    I can't help but wonder what the crime statistics would look like if just 10% more of the victims shot back.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: FWoo45, Flyingbullseye, LuckyDuck and 3 others
    #40
    That is a good start.

    I also think de-criminalizing a lot of stuff is probably in order. Or at least re-thinking what crimes are bad enough to warrant removal from society (imprisonment), removal from the gene pool (death), and all the other stuff that could be handled better through restitution. Restitution for me would mean that once you pay your debt to society all rights are restored to you.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: MK20
    #41
    akmike47 said:
    Shall not be infringed. Funny how many people claim to support 2A till the other sides involved and magically they support infringement
    Click to expand...
    This. Plus always ask--if a Dem had this kinda of power how would they abuse it.

    Don't believe in Climate Change? Mentally Ill
    Don't believe gender is a construct? No guns for you!

    Not to mention violation of due process. Where all my cop lovers at?

    Most people don't want freedom, they want to be dictators with their views enforced, hopefully by someone else so their conscience is clean.
     
    • Like
    • Love
    Reactions: MediumSpeed, Holliday, oneshot86 and 1 other person
    #44
    The real issue is these shootings don't happen in a vacuum. The people around the shooter got hints and info and said " oh they'll never do it " . Well guess what . Anyone with prior knowledge should be charged, perp walked and displayed. See how fast these ass hats start outing froot loops to avoid prosecution.
    And DA's need to prosecute whacks making these murder declarations .
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Similar threads

    U
    New Mexico Governor Bans Open and Concealed Carry
    Replies
    245
    Views
    11K
    UKDslayer
    U
    U
    New Gun Control Bill Coming...
    Replies
    40
    Views
    3K
    Snuby642
    Snuby642
    Bender
    Cops Tackle Father After Tranny Raped Daughter At School
    Replies
    116
    Views
    11K
    TexPatriot
    T
    Fred @ Bison Tactical
    Boulder, Lafyette, Louisville Colorado Pass 6 new gun laws - other considering for now.
    Replies
    83
    Views
    4K
    KYAggie
    KYAggie
    Blue Sky Country
    Alberta OFFICIALLY takes firm stance refusing to comply with Trudeau gun ban. Constitutional jurisdiction enforced by provincial lawmakers.
    Replies
    4
    Views
    903
    LMTMWS
    L
    Top Bottom
    Back
    Home
    Forums
    Merch
    Alerts