breaking an unconstitutional law makes you a patriot not a felon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Offer valid until 9/23! If you have an annual subscription on Sniper's Hide, subscribe below and you'll be refunded the difference.
SubscribeNot in their eyes.breaking an unconstitutional law makes you a patriot not a felon.
But the good part is least in the final days, you will be among true Americans, not just the fales an lipp'ers. An just look at this way, those who were trained for export get to apply their wears in a land where they don't stick out. May get way more mileage in the closing days if they really want to dance an play tag.The irony is men who have spent their whole lives as law abiding citizens, will now be felons.
LOLOLOL. you think 10% will "easily be put down". Lmao. 1% would cause major issues.We will see. I think there are a lot more posers than you think. I suspect out of all gun owners, 10% might resist and that 10% is fractured and unorganized at best. Whoever resist will he easily put down and be a blurb on the msm about being a terrorist. This battle was started long ago and we have been losing every since, with a false perception of winning. Add in the fact that anyone pro 2A has been eating their own and...you get the idea.
LOLOLOL. you think 10% will "easily be put down". Lmao. 1% would cause major issues.
A semi auto center fire f***s .gov agents up. That's why they want to ban them.
LMAO. I think if you are going to hold up in your house against 30 PD officers and agents or more and think you have a chance, you have lost it. Only way you survive that is if you have lots of goodies, back up or a hidden escape route lol. But this lone range bravado crap is laughable. That’s my point, the ones who will stand up and think they have a chance are so fractured and unorganized in most cases, their fight will end before it begins. There may be some groups that have banned together and have some idea of how to stave off some unconstitutional bullshit, but I’d wager that most don’t. I cannot tell you how many times I’ve heard people say, they will have to pry it from my cold dead hands while I will fight them in my house. That’s laughable. They aren’t going to give you warning and are smart enough to come raid your house ninja style at 3 am while you are fast asleep. We only have a chance as a group or groups of people. Anything else would be suicide.
IMHO, there won't be door-to-door confiscations because it would be brutally violent for all involved. That would include officer-gungrabber returning home to see the fire dept putting his house out or getting a surprise load of 00 to the back of the noggin when getting into his car early one morning. The politicians are smart enough to know better. All they have to do is outlaw weapons or certain weapons. A lot of folks would give them up just because it was illegal and others will just hold on to them. Eventually granddads (your) guns get handed over when they ship your ass off to the nursing home.LMAO. I think if you are going to hold up in your house against 30 PD officers and agents or more and think you have a chance, you have lost it. Only way you survive that is if you have lots of goodies, back up or a hidden escape route lol. But this lone range bravado crap is laughable. That’s my point, the ones who will stand up and think they have a chance are so fractured and unorganized in most cases, their fight will end before it begins. There may be some groups that have banned together and have some idea of how to stave off some unconstitutional bullshit, but I’d wager that most don’t. I cannot tell you how many times I’ve heard people say, they will have to pry it from my cold dead hands while I will fight them in my house. That’s laughable. They aren’t going to give you warning and are smart enough to come raid your house ninja style at 3 am while you are fast asleep. We only have a chance as a group or groups of people. Anything else would be suicide.
Oh they will get the first houses they come for.
After that they will all die lol. People will form ambushes/attacks/etc.
And even though you might not win against 30 tyrants. You will take 1-10 with you and they will quickly run out of people.
These pussies hide outside when there is a 14 year old with a gun. What are they going to do when they start running up against seasoned war veterans some of who unfortunately don't really care if they make it.
There's a lot of rural areas where every house has multiple guns. good luck.
The reality is they will never go door to door. They play the long game and will destroy guns in popular culture so there won't be enough people that want them or have the skills to use them. IE banning anything gun related in schools and expelling people for chewing a pot tart into a gun
IMHO, there won't be door-to-door confiscations because it would be brutally violent for all involved. That would include officer-gungrabber returning home to see the fire dept putting his house out or getting a surprise load of 00 to the back of the noggin when getting into his car early one morning. The politicians are smart enough to know better. All they have to do is outlaw weapons or certain weapons. A lot of folks would give them up just because it was illegal and others will just hold on to them. Eventually granddads (your) guns get handed over when they ship your ass off to the nursing home.
That's likely where we're headed.... In the end, they still win.
That's what england thought long ago when only farmers had enough. Then only 3 % stood up an said no, an the rest per-say is history.That’s exactly what will happen and despite the means, they still win.
In the end, they still win.
That's what england thought long ago when only farmers had enough. Then only 3 % stood up an said no, an the rest per-say is history.
Nothing is over until it's over, but giving up/in before it's really began is telling.
There are more groups out there that don't lavish or partake of the net, than do. Not everything is as it seems to some eyes,...Everyone is a patriot until it’s time to meet up and put up. This ain’t the 1770’s.
In the end, they still win.
I do mind unconstitutional red flag laws and will fight if/when they try that crap in my state/Alamo. Fight, move, dig in or kiss the ring. Your choice. I’ve made mine. Only God has the right to judge me. For every sane person you can present I can find a mob that will argue they are crazy, insane, unstable, ect.I do not mind red flag laws. But they should begin by getting a summons to appear. You must be presumed innocent. The Gov should have to prove you are a threat.
Not knock, knock “get on the floor motherfucker”. JMHO
I do not mind red flag laws. But they should begin by getting a summons to appear. You must be presumed innocent. The Gov should have to prove you are a threat.
Not knock, knock “get on the floor motherfucker”. JMHO
You are not keeping your eye on the ball, Trump is. 2a is the ball, not red flag laws. JMHO Like I said "Due Process" does not scare me.
You are not keeping your eye on the ball, Trump is. 2a is the ball, not red flag laws. JMHO Like I said "Due Process" does not scare me.
Rapid due process did not work out so well for many accused of stealing horses or cattle rustling, that were in fact innocent.When mentioning his red flag laws, he specifically said "rapid due process" instead of "i like taking the guns first, then due process."
Well your kin an friends always have options,...AFAIK none of the red flag laws in the states that have enacted them have any form of penalties for an accuser who has lied.
Rapid due process did not work out so well for many accused of stealing horses or cattle rustling, that were in fact innocent.
Ha, I ain’t giving up. I’m just trying to rile people up. Even tho, I don’t think there is as many of us as people think. Everyone is a patriot until it’s time to meet up and put up. This ain’t the 1770’s.
I’m hearing all kinds of people on the radio this morning that’s all ready to sell us down river for red flag laws as a reasonable thing to do. That’s just buying time and encouraging implementing a system bound to be ripe with abuse.
As long as there is due process, im good with it. In fact, i'd rather true "rapid due process" be the standard. If i were ever the one in question, i would want to "rapidly" be exonerated so i can move on with my life. Due process is due process. The quicker it were to be done with, the better. Now, if "rapid due process" is not, in fact, due process at all, that is obviously an issue.
Prohibited person:
What's a Red Flag law supposed to do that the above doesn't cover? Is anyone here proposing we add to the list of what makes someone a prohibited person???
- convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
- who is a fugitive from justice;
- who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. § 802);
- who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;
- who is an illegal alien;
- who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
- who has renounced his or her United States citizenship;
- who is subject to a court order restraining the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of the intimate partner; or
- who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.
Maybe just ban millennials?
You are not keeping your eye on the ball, Trump is. 2a is the ball, not red flag laws. JMHO Like I said "Due Process" does not scare me.
The smell of piss 24/7 an crys of pain no matter what kind does not appeal to me. The cry of the wild or MAGA is a more befitting end to some,...Unfortunately they will be the people running the nursing homes we may have to spend our golden years in.
There are more groups out there that don't lavish or partake of the net, than do. Not everything is as it seems to some eyes,...
Prohibited person:
What's a Red Flag law supposed to do that the above doesn't cover? Is anyone here proposing we add to the list of what makes someone a prohibited person???
- convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
- who is a fugitive from justice;
- who is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act, codified at 21 U.S.C. § 802);
- who has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;
- who is an illegal alien;
- who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
- who has renounced his or her United States citizenship;
- who is subject to a court order restraining the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of the intimate partner; or
- who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.
Anyone that is in support of any unconstitutional law or act is at best naive, at worst mentally defective, crazy, and or lacking what it takes to be a lawful citizen in a free society. When/if the shit starts I will not allow any red flag supporter to be armed in my presence. I have the right of being innocent till found guilty by a jury of my peers. I already have enough stuff hidden at enough locations to simply hand over “what I got” if I find myself in a compromised or massively outnumbered situation. I’m not a easy person to surprise though, and more brainwashed idiots that want to agree with violating anyone’s rights, especially those outlined in the constitution and bill of rights, just drive me to scout out more locations further away. If we were dependent on people like you then America would already be a lost cause.As long as there is due process, im good with it. In fact, i'd rather true "rapid due process" be the standard. If i were ever the one in question, i would want to "rapidly" be exonerated so i can move on with my life. Due process is due process. The quicker it were to be done with, the better. Now, if "rapid due process" is not, in fact, due process at all, that is obviously an issue.
None of the highlighted consistently show up in a background either. The biggest issue I see is a bad system of records, HIPAA and Privacy laws that restrict access to information which could help identify prohibited persons.
I've lived in El Paso Twice, I like El Paso better than any other town in Tx. Its a complicated town, not what you all think.
Which of the three latest shootings would it have prevented? CA Garlic, El Paso, OH?