• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

Active Shooter in El Paso???

Once again... we see that a warning was given. And nothing was done.


I dunno man, most civilians, let alone mothers (let alone other shooters), have no clue about weapons. IF she did call, it may have been just out of curiosity because of how it looked. Maybe she was only ever exposed to firearms such as bolt action hunting rifles and revolvers? That’s what (can be safely assumed) most people have encountered when not directly related or in proximity of someone who owns more “advanced/modern” (lol) firearms.

Hell, I can’t count how many times I showed people my bitch ass DPMS “AR”, I purchased back during the AWB, just to be asked if it was my issued rifle because “it looks like a military rifle. Hell, I even got asked that when was at the range with my M1A or A3G. For the most part, civilians have zero clue about firearms and base their views off of tv/movies.

Is it plausible that she was calling in regards to what her son owned?
-Definitely.

Is it plausible that she had a voice in the back of her head that was concerned about her son’s well-being/mental health which lead her to call about a firearm?
-Definitely

Is it possible that if a “Red Flag Law” was part of policy AND that LE would have followed up and POSSIBLY prevented this from happening?
-Definitely

We can’t pick and choose narratives.

We either believe that she was concerned about her son’s behavior and a RFL could have prevented the shooting and saved American lives...

-OR-

The phone records show she never called the authorities and it was just to divert blame...because she knows there was something wrong with her son but never acted on her gut...
#HindsightIs20/20

We can’t only accept the scenarios that result in the best outcome(s) for us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sirhrmechanic
Side note: as someone who is always flagged by TSA due to his appearance, I’m not 100% on board with RFLs lol I’d probably be targeted within :30s of it being enacted in whatever state I’m in lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blutroop
We don't need any new laws.

That mentality is gonna loose the Republicans the election.

True, but how do how you defeat people who don’t know what they are talking about? Use their ignorance against them. Hell, talk up how fully rotational QD sling swivels allow the weapon to be fired from any position and inflict the most damage.

We have the ability to sell these people the biggest liars of bullshit because they refuse to understand or grasp any sort of information pertaining to the items them deem as dangerous. But no, let’s keep fighting them on actual matters lol.

Ban QD full positional firing swivels and 3pt combat slings!!!!!!

Manipulation is key, not emotion. Control the narrative, control emotions. Or is this too difficult to grasp?

We bitch about Bump stocks... who fucking owned them? The fucking Walmart weirdos who jerk off to anime porn. Fuck Bump stocks. They were invented by someone who produced a piece of shit Walmart-grade accessory that only fucking weirdos wanted (unless it was for a joke). Let it go already about Bumpstocks. Control the narrative and stop with caring about nothingness.

Everyone wants to bitch about AOC and how she should go back to being a bartender because she knows nothing... (she doesn't). ...but what does that tell and show you? That ANYONE can be elected. SO IF YOU DONT LIKE THE CURRENT POLICIES OR HOW THINGS ARE GOING, RUN FOR OFFICE AND CONTROL THE NARRATIVE!
 
Whining ass liberals will call popo on you every chance.

Had a local unit pull up next to the fence in the back yard once.
Rolled down his window.
Said someone called to say I was waving a gun around.

Told him it was just an upper and further more needed 3 more coats of whatever I was using and hang in the sun to cure by uv and heat.

No I'm not spray painting in the house.

Red flag laws my ass.
No new god damn laws !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Infidel01
Anyone advocating new laws sucks.
Not helping.

Starting to smell like liberals .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blutroop
Red flag laws sound fine in principle... you know, like socialism.

Red flag laws utterly break down in practice... you know, like socialism.

We don’t need additional laws for the concept of “If someone is acting batshit crazy and keeping rape and kill lists... say something” to help prevent tragedy.

Just another way to attack the civil rights of law abiding Americans.

Where is the ACLU on this, anyway. If you even say “shushh”! to some chatty-Kathy at a movie theater, they are on you for violating the first amendment. Take a piece of paper out of a trash bin and they sue over 4th amendment violations. On the 2a, crickets. The bill of rights is not multiple choice. It is “All of the above.”

Sirhr
 
We bitch about Bump stocks... who fucking owned them? The fucking Walmart weirdos who jerk off to anime porn. Fuck Bump stocks.
?
Yeah, maybe that was Trump's plan. Ban bump stocks, which even though people bitched about it because they lost something, they dont matter in the big picture. He knew if he banned something, he might not have to worry about hearing about a gun ban. It's possible. I'm sure there would be enough people whining about losing QD slings that dems would feel like it's another win for them.
 
?
Yeah, maybe that was Trump's plan. Ban bump stocks, which even though people bitched about it because they lost something, they dont matter in the big picture. He knew if he banned something, he might not have to worry about hearing about a gun ban. It's possible. I'm sure there would be enough people whining about losing QD slings that dems would feel like it's another win for them.

THEY CAN TAKE MY M4’s BAYONET LUG OVER MY COLD DEAD BODY! lol
 
The commies wont quit till there are no parts left.

This has got to be stopped.

Scopes over 9 power next?

How about those scary looking buis and red dot lasers.
Maybe all guns should be painted flame orange and dipped in glitter to make the dem bitches happy?

It must stop now.
 
Yeah because if you give them a little taste of victory, we all know that the Liberal slime won't come looking for any other parts of your gun. Yeah I didn't have a bumpstock, why should I care some say... because a lot of gun owners don't have an AR either, so when they come for yours, you'll be bitching up a storm "where was everyone" and they'll reply, why do I care, I didn't want one of those guns, I only like handguns.

Fucking Ray Charles could see the narrow mindedness in these threads as of late.
?
Yeah, maybe that was Trump's plan. Ban bump stocks, which even though people bitched about it because they lost something, they dont matter in the big picture. He knew if he banned something, he might not have to worry about hearing about a gun ban. It's possible. I'm sure there would be enough people whining about losing QD slings that dems would feel like it's another win for them.
 
Everyone wants to bitch about what the opposing party is trying to do but no one wants to stop and think about how they can counter them politically and peacefully in REALITY.

Rather it’s just the same old fucking calls for violence from ignorant inbreds and bitching from people who’s blood pressure medicine is in need of an adjustment. The older generation has no one to blame but themselves for the world they formed.

Stop with the ignorance and blame-shifting by getting involved in politics. If AOC, the one who everyone views as uninformed, unintelligent, and incompetent can do it, then anyone can do it.
 
Was it Thomas Jefferson that said better a hundred criminals go free than one innocent suffer? Red flag must stop. We can give no more. Their is no appeasing those that want us as unarmed socialists. I never owned or wanted a bumpstock.. yet I cry for the hole it ripped in the constitution. We must stop the assaults on liberty and freedom. No one is free when anyone is oppressed. No firearm is safe when qd swivel mounts are sacrificed as the next bumpstock.
 
I took an oath to uphold the constitution, sounds like some would let commie basterds chip away at it.
Ok snuby642. If you run, I’ll vote 4 ya. I got to many skeletons overflowing from my closet to even shake the hand of someone running though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M8541Reaper
My thinking on this is a free man and a citizen of the US should have all rights guaranteed by the constitution no matter what if he is a free man

If he has committed a crime and after due process and a trial by his peers if he wants one and is convicted then he is no longer a free man and rights can be removed as a consequence

I know there are a bunch of freaks and weirdos out there but I still think it comes down to if you're free you have all your rights, if you're convicted of a crime then you don't

I personally think it's complete bs to try to take someone's rights if they haven't committed a crime
 
Does any of this really matter? The BOR are considered natural rights given to someone by God simply for existing, period. They are not granted by government and cannot be taken away. They just are. Only if you allow someone to take them away will they vanish. The founders gave everyone the tools. Use them. Quit being pussies and allowing people that think of themselves as masters to control you. Live your own life. Yes there are societal laws, but if you were law abiding then all of a sudden someone decided to make you a felon, then all 150 million gun owners might as well act like felons because they already are. If we stand together we can beat this. Protect each other’s backs. There is a chance. If everyone just gives in then it’s already over. At the end of the day there is 150,000,000 gun owners. Let that sink in. If we tell them no, what are they going to do? Again, cue up all the people telling me the military is going to come collect them or whatever. BS. Stand your ground. Don’t be pussies. What we really need to happen is companies stand their ground. If they do that and gun owners stand with them then it’s over.
 
If I were potus I would break djts
Record of pissing off people in a months time.
 
We bitch about Bump stocks... who fucking owned them? The fucking Walmart weirdos who jerk off to anime porn. Fuck Bump stocks. They were invented by someone who produced a piece of shit Walmart-grade accessory that only fucking weirdos wanted (unless it was for a joke). Let it go already about Bumpstocks. Control the narrative and stop with caring about nothingness.

I owned a bump stock, mostly as a joke as I only ever ran it on a M&P .22 rifle. Sure they were a dumb accessory and an overpriced piece of plastic, and in the back of my mind I figured they’d be banned eventually. My bitch is that my property was seized without compensation under threat of being a criminal if I didn’t comply. The bump stock is not important to me, but taking my property based on a bullshit decision to change a long standing definition of a machine gun is unacceptable. As others have stated, that decision will come back to haunt us under a different administration.

Every time the republicans call me begging for a donation to support the president I ask them where I send my bump stock receipt for reimbursement by their candidate.
 
Shooter was found blocks away sitting in his car stopped in the left lane,when a Police car stopped he got out and told them he was the shooter. Was wondering why Police didn't engage him in the mall apparently he left Walmart got in his car drove down the highway for a bit and decided to turn himself in. Seems strange , wonder if he was really the shooter ?
 
Was thinking some more about this... what mother calls the police to ask about her sons gun... unless she thinks something hinkey is up?

I mean... the kid was 21 or 22... if he was interested in the shooting sports, would that not be, say, a topic of dinner conversation? A ‘hey mom, I went to a range today and really enjoyed it and may take up sport shooting!” “That’s nice dear.”

That is how one would think a topic related to one’s new fire arms interest or purchase might come up, don’t you think?

Instead, mom calls police (maybe) to ask questions about her son’s new AK-clone? If it happened, regardless of the ‘questions’ doesn’t one think that an eyebrow might be raised? Is policing now so disconnected from society that an officer does not simply say “tell you what, I’ll stop by and chat and maybe I can give your son a few pointers on safety, storage and ranges?” A short visit would make mom feel better and let someone eyeball the situation. No need for turning anything into a major case... just a short visit. In this day and age... shouldn’t this have gotten the police built-in spideybsense tingling??

Maybe I’m still thinking like the small town Barney Fife I was... never worked the big city. Maybe no one gives a crap or is allowed to follow something like that on a hunch or informally.

But wouldn’t a call like that pique at least a little interest? Whose mom calls the police to ask questions when their kid buys a gun... if they don’t have a concern?

To gunmans point... that assumes the call was made at all. Guess the jury is still out on that. But if any call was made... even to ask simple questions, shouldn’t that have made someone say “probably nothing, but worth driving over to talk to mom and suss thing out for myself.”

Must be that the ‘not my job’ mentality is stronger in cities than here in Mayberry. Where being a neighbor and an officer was the job.

I’m probably living in 1955... what can I say.

Sirhr
Too busy taxing and harassing the tax slave. Those no 4th amendment zones aren't going to run themselves either.
 
My thinking on this is a free man and a citizen of the US should have all rights guaranteed by the constitution no matter what if he is a free man

If he has committed a crime and after due process and a trial by his peers if he wants one and is convicted then he is no longer a free man and rights can be removed as a consequence

I know there are a bunch of freaks and weirdos out there but I still think it comes down to if you're free you have all your rights, if you're convicted of a crime then you don't

I personally think it's complete bs to try to take someone's rights if they haven't committed a crime
I can certainly see how one could develop this opinion, but as the guy who frequently has had to deal with the "freaks and weirdos", I couldn't disagree more.
 
Was it Thomas Jefferson that said better a hundred criminals go free than one innocent suffer?

No. Wasnt TJ.

William Blackstone, "Commentaries on the Laws of England"
said in 1760, "it is better that 10 guilty go free than one innocent suffer".

Then old $100.00 Ben Franklin said, after reading Blackstone, "it is better that 100 guilty go free than one innocent suffer".

Would they have put Ben on the $50.00 if he had said ,"better 50 guilty go free"? Probably not. Several of the constitutional amendments would not be here today if not for Ben.
Jefferson did not want the same levels of freedom as old Ben. Old Ben was a very wise man.
 
Side note: as someone who is always flagged by TSA due to his appearance, I’m not 100% on board with RFLs lol I’d probably be targeted within :30s of it being enacted in whatever state I’m in lol.

There hasn't been any problem with my looks and despite my age, I'm rather youthful looking and slightly handsome at that:love:

With that said, even I worry about the RFLs. I've been falsely accused of different things in the past. It has always ended up with me proving my innocence NOT the other side proving of my guilt.

The liars in my past just say whatever they want and it's considered gospel until I can prove otherwise.

One of the biggest lies in this country is that an accused person is innocent until proven guilty and I'm living proof.
 
There hasn't been any problem with my looks and despite my age, I'm rather youthful looking and slightly handsome at that:love:

With that said, even I worry about the RFLs. I've been falsely accused of different things in the past. It has always ended up with me proving my innocence NOT the other side proving of my guilt.

The liars in my past just say whatever they want and it's considered gospel until I can prove otherwise.

One of the biggest lies in this country is that an accused person is innocent until proven guilty and I'm living proof.

Just because I have a few grey hairs now doesn’t mean I had them earlier this year (or every other rotation o Er the years for that matter) while rotating back to the states. When you have to lay out all of your LOA and multiple IDs to the TSA dude just to avoid an oil check, you know you have a certain look down pat. ...has nothing to do with the bloodshot drunken hateful rage eyes...

On a serious note, I can see where you’re coming from though.
 
Stop wearing rainbow assless spandex chaps and they will stop profiling you at San Francisco international.

Ummm... why would that get me flagged by SF’s TSA? Wouldn’t I fit in there? I get what you’re laying down though lol.

$20 is $20 and this new AIAX isn’t going to pay for itself.
 
Ummm... why would that get me flagged by SF’s TSA? Wouldn’t I fit in there? I get what you’re laying down though lol.

$20 is $20 and this new AIAX isn’t going to pay for itself.

You know it's going to be a bad day when the TSA screeners look like Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Clinton, Richard Simmons or Pee Wee Herman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArmyJerry
Once again... we see that a warning was given. And nothing was done.


Killin me smalls.

Is policing now so disconnected from society that an officer does not simply say “tell you what, I’ll stop by and chat and maybe I can give your son a few pointers on safety, storage and ranges?”

Guess the callers had more contact with the Popo in Mayberry? Hell, our dispatchers don't even talk to people that call, the call takers do, generate the call for service, that pops up on the dispatchers screen who then raises a car on the air to handle it.

That's assuming she really called at all, and if she did whoever answered didn't just answer whatever her 'question' was.

I find these threads sorta make me giggle at the hypocrisy of it all. The same folks (Not you, Sihr) who constantly bitch about police murdering people with impunity, abusing their authority, being complicit in gun confiscations, etc. are the same ones who point the finger and say 'Why didn't you do something?'

Like what? Confiscate his guns before he's done anything? Take away his freedom and force a mental health evaluation on him, which may prevent future gun purchases by the way.

They still have to actually do something for something to be done. I'm not Tom Cruise and I don't work for the Precrime division, nor does anybody I know?

He could be the most hate filled, vile, racist little fuck on Earth but that's his right until he actually makes a threat and we have a willing complainant. Short of that there's the mental health eval but that's hardly a fix, more of a three day bandaid.

Maybe I'm just the weird guy who works in LE that thinks people shouldn't be punished for shit they haven't done yet.

His moms is full of shit, by the way. There's no way she didn't know he was fuckin' whacked. You can raise them to believe in God and loving your neighbor all you want but don't tell me your first inkling of a problem was when your kid shot up a Walmart. ?