Filter

Judge rules your dog IS family.

As much as I'm for the law in general...does that mean we have to legally concede furries are human now? That'd be a bummer.



I knew a guy in Kansas who was more attached to his pet crayfish than most people like their own kids. Someone on Instagram had a pet crab that lived for almost 10 years. Is something that would normally be a wild animal, but that's in human care for whatever reason (medically incapable of being returned to the wild, etc) and has formed a non-normal bond with people (foxes, possums, or even the famous squirrel P'nut) supposed to be considered "less" of a pet?

I don't know that there's a good "yes/no" answer to it, since the level of emotional investment the person has in the animal is more important than what the animal is.
Yessir, that is precisely my point.

There comes a time where you either say "that is a human, and that is an animal (not a human)", or you allow the 58 genders ideology to bleed over into classifying the role and weight of a non-humans into human lives based off of one person's perspective and emotions vs another's.

Where and how does one draw the line?

It is a slippery slope. I think it a good place to allow for the working out of the great American experiment and within reason let the judge, or jury, make the decision.

Why and how was the animal killed. Was it self defense? and accident? or a malicious act?

Pure accident, I see no need for any punishment, civil or criminal. If it was an act of malicious intent, or abject carelessness, then yes, the owner should be entitled to some sort of compensation above the mere value of the animal. Its not about whether its an animal or human, its about the damage, emotional or financial to the owner.

Again, it should be left to a reasonable judge or jury, which is questionable to find.
  • Haha
Reactions: adubeau

Coup De Grâce, New Action from American Rifle Company, $899 WOW!

I'm finally getting my barreled action this week, but i have a question for you all. I am putting a scope that will not be the permanent scope but i want to get the proper rings for the permanent scope.

I am wondering what height rings you are using for a 56mm objective. It will sit in a manners compact stock and i need the objective clear a M24 contour.

Hope this makes sense.

This setup should clear any barrel swaps in the future.

I am looking at nightforce or mdt rings right now.

Thank you in advance.

Judge rules your dog IS family.

As much as I'm for the law in general...does that mean we have to legally concede furries are human now? That'd be a bummer.



I knew a guy in Kansas who was more attached to his pet crayfish than most people like their own kids. Someone on Instagram had a pet crab that lived for almost 10 years. Is something that would normally be a wild animal, but that's in human care for whatever reason (medically incapable of being returned to the wild, etc) and has formed a non-normal bond with people (foxes, possums, or even the famous squirrel P'nut) supposed to be considered "less" of a pet?

I don't know that there's a good "yes/no" answer to it, since the level of emotional investment the person has in the animal is more important than what the animal is.
U kilt ma cobra. Ivanna settlement.

Login to view embedded media

Best offset mount and red dot combo for AR?

Assuming that you've already made up your mind to go with an offset rather than a piggyback, I'd suggest going with an Arisaka. What's nice about the Arisaka is that the mounts are designed to be in line with the axis of the bore and they offer the option to go either 30 or 45 degree with the cant. I run mine at 30 degrees and this results in the red dot coming in line with just a flick of the wrist and much less rolling of the rifle.

My chosen setup is to use a 407k footprint plate with a Holosun EPS. I much prefer the enclosed dots. If you actually take your rifle out to places other than just the range, you'll quickly come to appreciate the enclosed dot.

Still, I prefer a piggyback setup. It is much more flexible. You just have to watch the mounting method you choose. You want to make sure that, in the event the red dot takes a hit, it won't affect your primary optic. I'm not a big fan of add on rings that attach to the scope body.

Judge rules your dog IS family.

As much as I'm for the law in general...does that mean we have to legally concede furries are human now? That'd be a bummer.



I knew a guy in Kansas who was more attached to his pet crayfish than most people like their own kids. Someone on Instagram had a pet crab that lived for almost 10 years. Is something that would normally be a wild animal, but that's in human care for whatever reason (medically incapable of being returned to the wild, etc) and has formed a non-normal bond with people (foxes, possums, or even the famous squirrel P'nut) supposed to be considered "less" of a pet?

I don't know that there's a good "yes/no" answer to it, since the level of emotional investment the person has in the animal is more important than what the animal is.

Yessir, that is precisely my point.

There comes a time where you either say "that is a human, and that is an animal (not a human)", or you allow the 58 genders ideology to bleed over into classifying the role and weight of a non-humans into human lives based off of one person's perspective and emotions vs another's.

Where and how does one draw the line?