If memory serves, Carbon 6 uses McGowan blanks, which used to be pretty good, but there have been rumblings over the interwebs that their quality has slipped considerably, which would explain the same slip in quality at carbon 6. They would likely be better off going with Shaw barrels, if their goal was good accuracy at an entry level price.

TTT

TTT

TheHorta said:

Be sure to wear this T-shirt:

View attachment 8767999

Click to expand...

His best role.

The minox has the MR4 reticle

Scope mount still available

JBoomhauer said:

This weekend I found something interesting with the LHT when setting the diopter.

Once the lock ring was loose, the ocular had some wiggle to it. This moved the reticle about .7 mil or so in any direction. I would imagine that once the lock ring is tightened again it would self center. I could see how a relatively small bump on the ocular with a slightly tight lock ring could result in a shift.

Click to expand...

That moves the whole image with the reticle. Where the reticle is IN the image (i.e. where the POA is) does not change.

All eyepieces exhibit this effect to some degree.

ILya

What’s wrong with the rifle, does it go bang and hit the target? This does not make sense. It could be how you want to shoot. Please explain the issues. Decent looking rifle, not my cup of tea, but not that out there.

theLBC said:

Click to expand...

These people are all demonic. They’re Satanist. If something is good then they call it bad. If something is beautiful they want to destroy it.

up

up

Already sold sorry man

armorpl8chikn said:

The natural man in me agrees with him. This makes me think he might be the antichrost.

Click to expand...

W54/XM-388 said:

He seems to like women a bit too much to fit that one, but he could be the false prophet to Theil's antichrist...

Click to expand...

Nah, I think that's trumps role. Go ahead and flame me. Not a trump hater. Never been a never Trumper. Voted for him twice. Always been a little skeptical about him on some things. Watch the video and get back to me.

Login to view embedded media

Gunfighter14e2 said:

Closed minds are why agendas are always allowed to move forward.

Click to expand...

There’s plenty of evidence this guy and his freak show faggot friends did the murder. There’s video of him all over the place and tons of incriminating statements. YouTubers are stuffing rifles down their pants and realizing that yes it can be done.

However there’s zero evidence to the contrary.

I’ve watched the YouTube’s saying otherwise and they’re all pants on head retarded. They use some fuzzy video footage to say another shooter is there or that one video that someone thought had a bullet flying in it. Or some goof who claims to be an expert saying a 3006 would make his head fly off.

Frankly at this point anyone saying conspiracy shit is either a troll or a retard.

Really needs to be an expedition clause for capital punishment when irrefutable DNA and/or video evidence is used for the initial conviction. 20 years ago those forms of identification/evidence existed far less, but not in today's America.

Also, screw the 'mentally competent' B.S. If the offender isn't capable of assimilation into society without demonstratedly being *violent* and deadly toward others, he/she needs to be euthanized anyway. This is NOT an argument for removing the mentally handicapped... it is an argument for removing the violent offenders. The stupid legal system is guilty of placing that 'mentally handicapped' banner over the perpetually violent. It is a garbage way to try to deflect blame.

I believe in physical castration for aggravated sexual assault too while we're at it, and capital punishment for the sexual assault of a child.

rockchalk06 said:

Keep in mind on the AR brass, is you have no idear on the primer they have used. I bought a bunch of the Sig .270 stuff. Good brass, necks are thicker than Peterson and need an E27 vs a T2 mandrel too keep my neck tension. Took a high anneal code as well. Primer looks like a CCI200, but it's not. I took 10 cases, popped the primers and seated a 200 in them. Same charge etc and I was 18 FPS slower with a lower SD v's theirs.

Not unhappy at all, just a note to keep in mind.

Click to expand...

I've been eye-ing that brass and think it might be a decent option for hunting loads.

Cue the “ounces equal pounds and pounds equal pain” crowd. lol

NateVA said:

People think about the goal of the testing in the wrong way. It's meant to raise red flags about an optic model, not definitively prove all scopes of a line are bombproof/garbage. If you think about it in that way you can find value in it. Let's say someone thinks a Leupold VX6 has a lemon rate of 1/1,000. Well two of them were just tested and both shit the bed. What's the likelihood the droptesters got two lemons in a row? That person might then have to re-evaluate what they think the lemon rate is.

Click to expand...

lol If you really want this testing to raise red flags, you need a statistically significant sample size. While a failure rate of 2 in a row sounds unlikely, it is just as likely be a fluke as it is to indicate an actual issue without more data. Anyone trying to draw a conclusion with confidence from such a small sample size would have their brain broken by a basic Stats class.