DeLane Development Group Rimfire Ventures

#11,301
RAVAGE88 said:
And, @carbonbased, so help me, if you bring up the LS vs Coyote debate....don't even....Coyote all the way.
Click to expand...
Lol wut?

At first glance I thought you’re were talking about coyote shooting and “LS” was some acronym for wild game, like (longus stinki-skunkus)
1746637165332.png


That corvette/mustang convo must’ve been with someone else. Unless it was the funniest thing ever. Then it was me. Lol

I do rapidly forget stuff…so might be my brain.

We did have a convo in which I accidentally reinvented some gun haha man I’m an idiot

Btw for more archived funny Road Runner latinus phrasius go here:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RAVAGE88
#11,302
carbonbased said:
Lol wut?

At first glance I thought you’re were talking about coyote shooting and “LS” was some acronym for wild game, like (longus stinki-skunkus)
View attachment 8681523

That corvette/mustang convo must’ve been with someone else. Unless it was the funniest thing ever. Then it was me. Lol

I do rapidly forget stuff…so might be my brain.

We did have a convo in which I accidentally reinvented some gun haha man I’m an idiot

Btw for more archived funny Road Runner latinus phrasius go here:
Click to expand...

Yep, you understood the assignment....

MB
 
  • Love
Reactions: carbonbased
#11,305
DownhillFromHere said:
So, one of Mike's challenges is to "innovate" a feeding solution that's innovative/accurate/precise AND as idiot-proof as possible, while still being marketable. The reality is, while the R700 footprint may not be the optimal accuracy/precision solution, it has damn sure sold a crap ton of Vudoos, Rim-Xs, and Bergaras.
Click to expand...
It is as painful to read that every time someone types it as it is reading the thousands of complaints about "feed problems" from the morons that can't load a magazine properly. We have to stop using the term/phase "idiot proof". Idiot Resistant is the best we can ever hope for.

Excited to see what you have on the way @RAVAGE88.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mechdesigner, RAVAGE88 and DownhillFromHere
#11,306
Cowpokey said:
It is as painful to read that every time someone types it as it is reading the thousands of complaints about "feed problems" from the morons that can't load a magazine properly. We have to stop using the term/phase "idiot proof". Idiot Resistant is the best we can ever hope for.

Excited to see what you have on the way @RAVAGE88.
Click to expand...
Lower magazine follower, put a round in, let rise to top. Repeat nine more times. it seems so hard doesn't it? Like maybe one would think that it would take a full team of Elon Musk' best engineers from SpaceX to load a Vudoo magazine.

Fired 3000 + rounds since April 2024. One misfeed period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAVAGE88, Cowpokey and ChrisFetter
#11,307
The most idiot-proof mag I’ve run across is the double-stack AR type. Just push round straight down. Although occasionally I’ll mess that up too by pushing the round down when part of it is overhanging the mag, but it’s obvious and I fix it immediately.

CZ 527 17 Hornet mags can be a little bitch, all around, however. That’s a rimmed CF cartridge and the shape of it plus the rim plus the spring pressure and limited area to depress the loaded round down all add up to suck.

Due to the round’s shape, the 22 Hornet loads a little easier in the same mag (CZ eventually made one mag for both the Hornets).

I suspect that the AR type of mag is a no-go in 22 rimfire, and I’m no fan of AR’s in general (bolt-gun master race), but hey. Don’t know if Stoner came up with that mag idea or if it was an earlier idea.

But MP5’s and AR’s sure are slick to load.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAVAGE88 and 68hoyt
#11,308
carbonbased said:
The most idiot-proof mag I’ve run across is the double-stack AR type. Just push round straight down. Although occasionally I’ll mess that up too by pushing the round down when part of it is overhanging the mag, but it’s obvious and I fix it immediately.

CZ 527 17 Hornet mags can be a little bitch, all around, however. That’s a rimmed CF cartridge and the shape of it plus the rim plus the spring pressure and limited area to depress the loaded round down all add up to suck.

Due to the round’s shape, the 22 Hornet loads a little easier in the same mag (CZ eventually made one mag for both the Hornets).

I suspect that the AR type of mag is a no-go in 22 rimfire, and I’m no fan of AR’s in general (bolt-gun master race), but hey. Don’t know if Stoner came up with that mag idea or if it was an earlier idea.

But MP5’s and AR’s sure are slick to load.
Click to expand...
Well not exactly. In Vietnam, we dare not load more than 18 rounds in a 20 round magazine nor load more than 28 rounds in our one and only precious 30 round magazine that we were so lovingly graced with by the powers that be. Like they must have been saving all the 30 round magazines for those fellows guarding their gated /double walled compounds downtown Saigon. After all, without all those precious fellows back in the rear, guarding their mint juleps and geisha girls how could we have ever won the FUCKING WAR!

Oh, loading to capacity was a sure way to get a jam.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAVAGE88 and carbonbased
#11,311
Carbonbased ,
I had thought about the ar 22 mags for the/a 22 bolt rifle of some sort , a little shorter axially , narrower , not as tall maybe , it seems to be a good idea ,,,,,,change the retention method from ar to a latch , just never got around to it
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAVAGE88 and carbonbased
#11,312
Kadams1563 said:
This is very odd..

VGW supposedly shits the bed and closes shop then ALL of a sudden MB starts another company.

If this wasn’t a set up and not in the works for awhile I’d be very surprised.

Go ahead and add this to the list of conspiracies.
Click to expand...
Seems like MB saw this coming a mile away and was ready to go when the timing was right. Rare is any successfull venture down to chance timing...more like planned timing.

If you were invested in a company (time or money) and were sort of shown the door, knowing that company was going downhill and had the means to pick up when you knew they were inevitably going to fail, would you sit on the sidelines waiting, or would you get ready to go so when that company did fail, you'd be ready to go? Because if you're not, someone else will.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daniel G. Banting, chiroz, BowChamp and 6 others
#11,314
lash said:
We’re off track, but that’s not necessarily true these days.
Click to expand...
Getting off the track seems to be my specialty.

Magazines? The old Savage / Anschutz metal single stack mags always seemed to work. (as much as I hated them) However, doing mag changes would be misery. So, and maybe thinking out of the box (no pun intended) what if an AW style double stack might feed better, (if and only IF it could be made to feed without shaving lead.) A hard task to accomplish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAVAGE88
#11,315
Dead Eye Dick said:
Getting off the track seems to be my specialty.

Magazines? The old Savage / Anschutz metal single stack mags always seemed to work. (as much as I hated them) However, doing mag changes would be misery. So, and maybe thinking out of the box (no pun intended) what if an AW style double stack might feed better, (if and only IF it could be made to feed without shaving lead.) A hard task to accomplish.
Click to expand...
Reading what Mike says above about feeding and round presentation to the bolt, I suspect that any DSDF (Dual Stack Dual Feed) magazine will present problems for .22 LR.

CZ owners will tell you that CZ knows how to do it. And I’m one of them. Maybe because as mentioned, it’s a proprietary platform and they control all the parts.

I’m not sure if those dropping CZs into a chassis are having issues with feeding as I’ve not seen it so far. Not that I think it can’t happen, I just haven’t seen it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dead Eye Dick, RAVAGE88 and carbonbased
#11,316
lash said:
Reading what Mike says above about feeding and round presentation to the bolt, I suspect that any DSDF (Dual Stack Dual Feed) magazine will present problems for .22 LR.

CZ owners will tell you that CZ knows how to do it. And I’m one of them. Maybe because as mentioned, it’s a proprietary platform and they control all the parts.

I’m not sure if those dropping CZs into a chassis are having issues with feeding as I’ve not seen it so far. Not that I think it can’t happen, I just haven’t seen it.
Click to expand...
Yeah, my CZ 455 Ultra Lux feeds pretty awesomely. And the mags are pretty easy to load.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAVAGE88
#11,317
lash said:
Reading what Mike says above about feeding and round presentation to the bolt, I suspect that any DSDF (Dual Stack Dual Feed) magazine will present problems for .22 LR.

CZ owners will tell you that CZ knows how to do it. And I’m one of them. Maybe because as mentioned, it’s a proprietary platform and they control all the parts.

I’m not sure if those dropping CZs into a chassis are having issues with feeding as I’ve not seen it so far. Not that I think it can’t happen, I just haven’t seen it.
Click to expand...

Because those CZ chassis are made for CZ Rimfire rifles. All the chassis and stocks that the 700 platform actions are getting dropped into are made for centerfire rifles so as I mentioned earlier why the mag height and placement is so important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Williwaw, RAVAGE88, lash and 2 others
#11,318
I apologize if this is sufficiently off topic to be considered "off the rails".
I have a vague memory of MB initially working with a group with the moniker "40X Mafia" or similar, converting single shot 40X ( 700 based action ) bench guns to repeaters. If my recollection is correct this was initiated some time before the popularity of PRS rimfire. I am not sure if there were specific competitive intentions there may have been for the conversions. ( I'm sure Mike can clarify ). If the intension was to build an understudy trainer capable of shooting cheap ammo for their PRIMARY centrefire gun then it was an out of the park home run!

I write the rest of this feeling about as aprehensive as sitting on a depth charge !

That initial and subsequent work has spawned a host of the most competitive PRS rim fire rifles the world has ever seen. Have you ever thought that might be due to oversight rather than functonal design.???????

I too bought into the appeal ( I agree with MBs above statement about maketeers vs gunmakers ) and have had a number of 700 platform builds. Not quite like putting lipstick on a pig but along the same lines. It seems to me that we got so caught up in the hype of building a duplicate of our centre fire guns we lost focus on what the REAL purpose was for MOST of the rim fire community ! We have ended up with .22 rifles in chassis that are so disproportinate ( due to the inordinate size of the mags ) that we are obliged to add balancing weights that we line up to buy at $75/$100 per pound ?! The forum threads on feeding issues through those mags are legion. Not only have we bought into the concept of very expensive add on weights we also often need 1.25" barrels to augment them.

We have develped shooting techniques based on free recoil and triggers in the ounces sitting on pillows that may weigh 15 pounds!

Part of this diatribe is due to the fact that I started my shooting journey as a 3P shooter. I still admire that group as being the very best rifle shooters inthe world. They adhere to a rifle weight limit of about 17 pounds and shoot at a target at 50 meters that has a 10 ring that measures very clost to .400". The scores shot on the original target were so high that they had to put a dot in the middle of the 10 so that a decimal was added to the 10 the closer you were to the exact centre.

I know what I am about to suggest is like a salmon swimming in the opposite directon to its peers but is there a possibility that we could rethink about what is the ideal "Rimfire PRS Rifle". One that can acheive a balance point in front of the mag with moderate weight and fed through a magazine designed to fit the cartridge rather than the action. I accept that it would me forgoing the conveinence of having all of that "stuff" available for a 700 action . I also aknowledge how difficult it would be to change direction when the trajectory is so well established.

It is my hope that this new company led by a brilliant individual can come up with something that may inspire us towards a change in what has become convential thinking regarding our beloved sport.

My best regards to all,
Daniel
 
  • Like
Reactions: chiroz, XP1K, Williwaw and 4 others
#11,319
Daniel G. Banting said:
I apologize if this is sufficiently off topic to be considered "off the rails".
I have a vague memory of MB initially working with a group with the moniker "40X Mafia" or similar, converting single shot 40X ( 700 based action ) bench guns to repeaters. If my recollection is correct this was initiated some time before the popularity of PRS rimfire. I am not sure if there were specific competitive intentions there may have been for the conversions. ( I'm sure Mike can clarify ). If the intension was to build an understudy trainer capable of shooting cheap ammo for their PRIMARY centrefire gun then it was an out of the park home run!

I write the rest of this feeling about as aprehensive as sitting on a depth charge !

That initial and subsequent work has spawned a host of the most competitive PRS rim fire rifles the world has ever seen. Have you ever thought that might be due to oversight rather than functonal design.???????

I too bought into the appeal ( I agree with MBs above statement about maketeers vs gunmakers ) and have had a number of 700 platform builds. Not quite like putting lipstick on a pig but along the same lines. It seems to me that we got so caught up in the hype of building a duplicate of our centre fire guns we lost focus on what the REAL purpose was for MOST of the rim fire community ! We have ended up with .22 rifles in chassis that are so disproportinate ( due to the inordinate size of the mags ) that we are obliged to add balancing weights that we line up to buy at $75/$100 per pound ?! The forum threads on feeding issues through those mags are legion. Not only have we bought into the concept of very expensive add on weights we also often need 1.25" barrels to augment them.

We have develped shooting techniques based on free recoil and triggers in the ounces sitting on pillows that may weigh 15 pounds!

Part of this diatribe is due to the fact that I started my shooting journey as a 3P shooter. I still admire that group as being the very best rifle shooters inthe world. They adhere to a rifle weight limit of about 17 pounds and shoot at a target at 50 meters that has a 10 ring that measures very clost to .400". The scores shot on the original target were so high that they had to put a dot in the middle of the 10 so that a decimal was added to the 10 the closer you were to the exact centre.

I know what I am about to suggest is like a salmon swimming in the opposite directon to its peers but is there a possibility that we could rethink about what is the ideal "Rimfire PRS Rifle". One that can acheive a balance point in front of the mag with moderate weight and fed through a magazine designed to fit the cartridge rather than the action. I accept that it would me forgoing the conveinence of having all of that "stuff" available for a 700 action . I also aknowledge how difficult it would be to change direction when the trajectory is so well established.

It is my hope that this new company led by a brilliant individual can come up with something that may inspire us towards a change in what has become convential thinking regarding our beloved sport.

My best regards to all,
Daniel
Click to expand...
Lengthy, but on point.
 
#11,320
Wow, you guys took this seriously and nothing mentioned is off-track at all. Although, based on conventional decorum, @lash would be correct, but I started it based on a few thoughts and you guys ran with it. This is how product development concepts are gathered in a focus group setting and you guys participated organically without any direct questions being asked. Pure awesomeness.

Yes @carbonbased, snnneeeeeaaakyyy :ROFLMAO: .

MB
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: XP1K, carbonbased and lash
#11,321
Ok, the solution for springs is squared away and a good portion of the small parts solution is moving along well. I'm continuing to work through the remainder of small parts, but see that going just as smoothly. Ultimately, getting closer to an inventory of all small parts.

Question: are any of you guys interested in any of the bolt knobs that Vudoo supplied to screw on to the Vudoo bolt handle? How about the DBMs the Vudoo offered and I designed?

MB
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pballkm21, deltawiskey, Jefe's Dope and 1 other person
#11,323
carbonbased said:
Accuracy International swept bolt knob or Sterk Tikka swept knob (master race?)

Never felt an Annie.
Click to expand...
Sorry, I wasn't specific. Bolt knobs as in the selection offered by Vudoo that screw onto the Vudoo bolt handle and the DBM offered by Vudoo that I designed.

MB
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: One Mile Up
#11,327
One Mile Up said:
@RAVAGE88 -- kind of a weird question... but... just out of curiosity --> will you / have you reached out to any "current" or former VGW employee's to see if you could scoop them up and get'em back to work (since they wouldn't really need much training! 😅)?
Click to expand...
Not a weird question and certainly valid in concept, but no, I haven't and I won't. I'm excited about the clean, unencumbered reset.

MB
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sagittarius, XP1K, Lilsnoop and 3 others
#11,328
RubiconJoey said:
Speaking of springs. I often wonder why constant force springs aren't used more often in magazines. Is it cost? Status quo? Maybe less reliable in extremely dirty conditions?
Click to expand...

Because of the possibility that the last few rounds could be forced past the feed lips. Less stack means less load and the constant force could be a greater mechanical advantage for the spring vs the ability of the feed lips to constrain the force.

MB
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChrisFetter and lash
#11,333
lash said:
I’m not familiar with with the voodoo setup at this point. I’m a…very…slow adopter these days since my budget shrunk. 🤷🏻‍♂️
Click to expand...
Gotcha. Just asking as I'm working to get a handle on what inventory to have on-hand. So far, it's all the small parts that makeup the action assembly. Other parts like bolts knobs and DBMs may not be of much interest.

MB
 
  • Like
Reactions: pballkm21
#11,334
RAVAGE88 said:
Gotcha. Just asking as I'm working to get a handle on what inventory to have on-hand. So far, it's all the small parts that makeup the action assembly. Other parts like bolts knobs and DBMs may not be of much interest.

MB
Click to expand...
Post up some pics of the bolt knobs to jog some memories. Will the bolt knobs fit both single shot and repeater??
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAVAGE88 and lash
#11,337
lash said:
Reading what Mike says above about feeding and round presentation to the bolt, I suspect that any DSDF (Dual Stack Dual Feed) magazine will present problems for .22 LR.

CZ owners will tell you that CZ knows how to do it. And I’m one of them. Maybe because as mentioned, it’s a proprietary platform and they control all the parts.

I’m not sure if those dropping CZs into a chassis are having issues with feeding as I’ve not seen it so far. Not that I think it can’t happen, I just haven’t seen it.
Click to expand...
The CZ mags lock into a mag well that's bolted to the bottom of the action....not the stock or chassis. This may be one reason for less feeding problems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChrisFetter, drglock, Daniel G. Banting and 3 others
#11,339
RAVAGE88 said:
Because of the possibility that the last few rounds could be forced past the feed lips. Less stack means less load and the constant force could be a greater mechanical advantage for the spring vs the ability of the feed lips to constrain the force.

MB
Click to expand...
Would it not be possible to size the spring appropriately? Surely a constant force spring that has less force at minimum stack (one round) than a wound spring at full stack could still have enough force to feed reliably. Especially with lightweight rounds such as 22.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RAVAGE88
#11,341
RAVAGE88 said:
So now, to focus on some key areas that appeared to be off-topic (Rem700, pre-64 Win, LS vs Coyote), but were dropped in to serve a larger conversation. Now it's time to add the next part.

The reason I used @carbonbased as a launch pad isn't only because he's a funny Dude and I knew he'd get it, but instead, because someone used the most over used word in the gun industry: INNOVATE.

If anything is done under the guise of innovation that doesn't properly serve this equation:

Accuracy and precision are two measures of observational error.

Accuracy is how close a given set of observations are to their true value.

Precision is how close the observations are to each other.

Is it really innovation?

MB
Click to expand...
Sorry, late to the party, but I will bite.

Innovation is being creative AND methodical to make accuracy and precision converge to meet the targeted goal (pun intended).

Incremental change is working from a base design and making small improvements/refinements to achieve a goal (maybe cost, maybe precision or accuracy or both) to differentiate from the competition and claim "its better". Sometimes, it addresses a deficiency in the current design or flaw found in actual use, but is usually mislabeled as innovation (sometimes haters call it "a solution looking for a problem").

Revolution is an approach that some would consider "radical" that changes or elevates a design to a whole new platform or way of thinking or operating that doesn't care to address minor flaws or issues, but is tired of working a problem the same ol conventional way of thinking and addresses it without accepting constraints that would limit how one would approach making a system manage precision and accuracy in a very predictable way to achieving a new level of performance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drew M, Jeffd, lash and 2 others
#11,343
RubiconJoey said:
Would it not be possible to size the spring appropriately? Surely a constant force spring that has less force at minimum stack (one round) than a wound spring at full stack could still have enough force to feed reliably. Especially with lightweight rounds such as 22.
Click to expand...
Yes, provided it's not all about the spring and other key features are addressed appropriately. The operating dynamics throw a whole new set of problems into the mix along with the characteristics of what's being fed, as in design of the case (protruding or rebated rim, taper, and so on).

MB
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drew M, lash and RubiconJoey
#11,344
J_Reacher said:
Sorry, late to the party, but I will bite.

Innovation is being creative AND methodical to make accuracy and precision converge to meet the targeted goal (pun intended).

Incremental change is working from a base design and making small improvements/refinements to achieve a goal (maybe cost, maybe precision or accuracy or both) to differentiate from the competition and claim "its better". Sometimes, it addresses a deficiency in the current design or flaw found in actual use, but is usually mislabeled as innovation (sometimes haters call it "a solution looking for a problem").

Revolution is an approach that some would consider "radical" that changes or elevates a design to a whole new platform or way of thinking or operating that doesn't care to address minor flaws or issues, but is tired of working a problem the same ol conventional way of thinking and addresses it without accepting constraints that would limit how one would approach making a system manage precision and accuracy in a very predictable way to achieving a new level of performance.
Click to expand...
Very well stated....

MB
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drew M and J_Reacher
#11,345
The High End .22lr World is becoming about as exciting as the race to MARS by SpaceX. It keeps building up, new stuff everywhere, the old, good stuff falling by the wayside.

And I can’t wait, to see it all work out.

(In my case, time is of the essence, its not critical, but I like to think in months, as years are passing so darn fast).

IMG_1589.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Schütze, Drew M, mrmarklin and 5 others
#11,346
Dead Eye Dick said:
The High End .22lr World is becoming about as exciting as the race to MARS by SpaceX. It keeps building up, new stuff everywhere, the old, good stuff falling by the wayside.

And I can’t wait, to see it all work out.

(In my case, time is of the essence, its not critical, but I like to think in months, as years are passing so darn fast).

View attachment 8682109
Click to expand...
Well said, and I have to say, I've not been this excited in a long time.

MB
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schütze, Drew M, darth_ritis and 4 others
#11,348
drewh said:
While I don't have a specific need at the moment, I do like the Vudoo bottom metal on my gen 1 Sinister and am thinking of moving my gen 2 into a stock vs chassis. Will you be offering action wrenches, kick myself for not getting those when available.
Click to expand...
Gotcha. I can offer the DBM, but it will be branded differently, if there's enough interest. Yes, I'll be doing the action wrenches and will keep everyone updated on their availability.

MB
 
  • Like
Reactions: accurate obsession and J_Reacher
#11,349
MB ,
Mags and mag springs , I have seen discussions in the past about people looking into clock type springs , why won’t these work ?
It would seem to work great in theory , with all the extra space in your mag design behind the actual 22 mag column you could put the wound clock spring back there , I don’t know
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SkepticalTiger
Henry Youth H001Y Range Report and Groupings
Replies
2
Views
923
SkepticalTiger
SkepticalTiger
Trigger Monkey
Bergara B-14R Review
Replies
57
Views
36K
CaseFinder
CaseFinder
Glassaholic
Rifle Scopes Alpha Class Long Range Scope Review - TT, ZCO, Schmidt, March, Vortex
Replies
205
Views
42K
Dutch308
D
Just Macca
Anschutz 1727F Review - By Steve Boelter
Replies
39
Views
12K
steve123
S
E
2019 SHOT Show (ELR-Specific): Day 1 (Tuesday, Jan 22, 2019)
Replies
11
Views
1K
ELR researcher
E
Top Bottom
Back
Home
Forums
Merch
Alerts