• Range Day Contest - Only a Few Hours Left To Enter!

    Tell us about your last day at the range, but there’s a catch: Describe it in just 5 words. Winner gets new limited edition Hide merch. Remember, subscribers have a better chance of winning!

    Join contest Subscribe

Filter

Precision Rifle Gear Win a Ranger XP1000 Loaded with Rifles, Suppressors and Ammo

Gear up for the ultimate adventure with the Lock & Load Giveaway! Enter now for a chance to win a brand-new Polaris Ranger XP1000, fully tricked out with top-notch gear from Kolpin Outdoors, five Springfield Armory rifles, premium suppressors from Silencer Central, and a generous supply of ammunition from Federal.
lock-load-giveaway-email-1200x1800.jpg


Link To Enter

‘Entry level Rifle Setup’

Looking to dip my toes into the bolt gun world after spending all of my time in the AR world. Looking for viable options under $3k that can either be built or turnkeyed from a reputable company.

So far I’ve got the list of turnkey rifles at:
- MPA Matrix Pro PMR
- Aero Solus Competition
- Seekins Havak HIT Pro M3
- Tikka T3X Ace Target

All would be in 6.5 Creedmoor as I’ve got 2 AR10’s already chambered in that round, and good factory ammo is readily available.

I’m currently leaning towards the Seekins because of the quick change barrel option, but I’ve heard there are issues with the HIT taking pre-fits if I ever wanted to change calibers or upgrade barrels.

Are there other options I should be considering? Is it worth looking to assemble a rifle with a $3k budget?

Match grade barrel fouling after 40rds?

Hello, I recently purchased my first "match grade" barrel to get more involved in long range shooting/hunting and I am having trouble understanding what is going on here.

I read a lot of people say they dont clean their barrels for 400+ rounds before accuracy drops off, and cleaning too frequently will wear out the barrel. Other reputable sources say clean every 30-40 rounds.

After i clean this barrel, i fire a few fouler shots. Rounds #3-30 shoot exceptionally well (sub 1/2moa 5-shots). Rounds #30-40 start creeping up velocity, and by round #40 i have gained 80fps and start getting pressure signs, the groups open up significantly

Should I consider the possibility that this barrel does not settle in with enough fouling until 40rds, try a lighter charge to get back to my velocity node, and then hopefully the velocity remains stable for hundreds of rounds before cleaning?

Or should i accept that this barrel requires cleaning every 40 rounds, and continue on. Thanks in advance!

24" OMR barrel ~160rds through it
6.5 prc
143gr ELDX 58.3gr H1000 .035 off lands

Optics WTT Leupold MK5 7-35

I have a Leupold MK5 HD 7-35 scope w/CCH mils reticle, that I am wanting to trade for another 7-35x mk5 in MOA. It’s only about 11 months old, I picked it up because I got a good deal on it, but it’s the only scope I run that isn’t in MOA, and I’d like to just keep everything consistent. Does NOT include scope mount. I will throw in the scope chap and some dry erase turret tape.

For the sake of putting a price on it, let’s say scope and mount for $2200 shipped.

Attachments

  • IMG_9968.jpeg
    IMG_9968.jpeg
    623.9 KB · Views: 108
  • IMG_9969.jpeg
    IMG_9969.jpeg
    637.9 KB · Views: 104
  • IMG_9970.jpeg
    IMG_9970.jpeg
    577.6 KB · Views: 112
  • IMG_9971.jpeg
    IMG_9971.jpeg
    485.8 KB · Views: 111
  • IMG_9972.jpeg
    IMG_9972.jpeg
    654 KB · Views: 119

7-6.5 PRC

I think there was a group of us that was super stoked that the 7 PRC would be a adaptation of the 6.5 PRC, at least, I was.

Now that we know that it's not, we can start making one ourselves. I've talked to PVA and they have a reamer ready to go. Brass is easy to find and good quality. F-class guys are pushing 180 hybrids 2900-2925. I'd imagine that's using a long action though. Based on looks alone I don't think it'd be giving much if anything up to the 7 RSAUM or sherman's (SS & SST).

It seems that using a short action will always be compromising when looking at a magnum. I'm hoping this fits my needs until I build a dedicated ELR rig. I've been bouncing a lot of ideas around but I think this is where I'm landing.

What do you guys think?

Has anyone here been running one?

224 Valkyrie / 6.5 Creedmoor / 7-6.5 PRC
20221015_123946.jpg

7-6.5/w 180 hybrid, 162 eldx, 151 cayuga, 180 hybrid. All set at mag length.
20221015_124139.jpg

Iron Brigade Armory

I just had an old timer drop a gun off with me to help him get rid of it, its a 700 built by Iron Brigade Armory. He said he had it built and only shot about a box of ammo through it then let it sit in the safe, the thing is essentially new. Digging around on here and across the internet I'm having a hard time coming up with a real world value for this. I'm hoping someone on here knows more about Iron Brigade builds and their values than me.

Attachments

  • 20240203_170121.jpg
    20240203_170121.jpg
    250.1 KB · Views: 416
  • 20240203_170016.jpg
    20240203_170016.jpg
    253.9 KB · Views: 388
  • 20240203_170044.jpg
    20240203_170044.jpg
    221.7 KB · Views: 406
  • Adobe Scan Feb 03, 2024.pdf
    405.1 KB · Views: 192

Optics Optics, stock, RRS head, large frame AR for sale

  1. 13.7 P/W AR308 6.5 creedmoor built by Perry precision 1250 shipped.
    1. Grey ghost upper/lower
    2. Geissele trigger
    3. Ballistic advantage 13.7 stainless 6.5 cred barrel
    4. Pinned nox Keymo FH
    5. SLR rail
    6. SLR gasblock
    7. Magpul stock
  2. RRS BH40-SCR head w/R-lock adapter 300 shipped
  3. Leupold mk5HD PR2 3.6-18. $1500 NO MOUNT shipped and insured
  4. Mk4HD scope only 6-24 PR2. Has slight scuffs on housing, functions perfect. 900 shipped and insured
  5. MK4HD PR3 mil 6-24 mounted and used a total of 50 rounds. SOLD.
  6. Vortex impact 4k wmlrf never actually used. 1250 shipped with remote and remote mounts, no box
  7. Left hand MG2 stock with 8 weights, and rlock foundation rail. 725 shipped. SOLD.
If you have questions DM me.

No real trades, other than the rifle for a Kahles 624i newest gen with the SMKR reticle.

IMG_6221.jpeg
IMG_6222.jpeg
IMG_6224.jpeg
IMG_6227.jpeg
IMG_6228.jpeg

Night Vision Night Vision Generation Comparison Guide

Practical Application of Night Vision for Domestic
Law Enforcement & Homeland Security


By
Chip Lasky, TNVC Director of Operations & Product Development
And
John Chapman, Director of Training, LMS Defense


The purpose of this informational paper is to provide the reader with the strengths and weaknesses of the most commonly available night vision systems when applied to the US domestic law enforcement and homeland security mission. On August 17 and 18, 2010, Chip Lasky and John Chapman conducted a series of tests with the mandate to gather realistic data in order to 1) determine the effectiveness of commonly available night vision when utilized in real world circumstances; and 2) utilize this data to determine a minimum level of capability appropriate for domestic law enforcement and homeland security missions. The reason for this undertaking is to provide the law enforcement professional a basis for understanding the capabilities and limitations of various image intensifiers on the market. This informational paper is intended to dispel the confusion surrounding the appropriateness of various devices and their associated image intensifier tubes. This article is not meant to address the technical merits or deficiencies in these devices so much as to provide a realistic portrayal of their capabilities in side-by-side comparison.

To accomplish these goals, we developed a realistic set of scenarios based on real world circumstances likely to be encountered by the user community. We then utilized the five most common night vision devices covering the three most common image intensifier generations available to the domestic user community to observe these scenarios from the responder’s perspective. Each device was tested in each scenario to gather data in three modes: 1) Passive observation using only the available environment’s ambient light; 2) passive observation using each unit’s internal infrared (IR) Illuminator; and 3) Passive observation using a secondary IR Illuminator (Surefire M1 IR Illuminator). A professional photographer then captured photos through each device in each mode, using the same shutter speed and other camera settings. These camera settings were determined by setting up the camera in the mode and shutter speed most favorable to the device with the tube that gathered the least amount of light (the ATN Viper Gen1+).

The need to rapidly and accurately identify threats such as a weapon in a suspect’s hand is overwhelmingly obvious for those going into harm’s way. This was a requisite in developing the scenarios for this article. The idea is to best describe, through photo documentation, the ability to detect and identify threats in accordance with domestic laws of Use of Force. We chose several different locales in which law enforcement personnel are likely to encounter a suspect while using night vision.

Photo documentation was collected with a Nikon D700 Digital SLR Camera. Images are shown as-is with no alteration or retouching. Raw data files are available for peer review.

The five devices tested were:

NEPVS14_af.jpg

1.ITT PVS-14 Night Enforcer Gen3 PINNACLE Auto-Gated Image Intensifier (ITTE-NEPVS-14-17)
•Gen3 U.S. ITT PINNACLE
•Resolution: 64-72 lp/mm Typical
•Thin-Film
•Auto-Gated
•Adjustable/ Variable Gain
•1x +0.03 Magnification
•40º + 2º Field of View (FOV)
•F/1.2 Objective Lens
•EFL 26mm Ocular Lens
•Diopter +4 to -6
•10″ to Infinity Focus

PVS14L3_af.jpg

2.Litton (L3) PVS-14 Gen3 Auto-Gated Image Intensifier
•Gen3 U.S. Litton Auto-Gated
•Resolution: 64 lp/mm Typical
•Thin-Film
•Auto-Gated
•Adjustable/ Variable Gain
•1x Magnification
•40º Field of View (FOV)
•F/1.2 Objective Lens
•EFL 26mm Ocular Lens
•Diopter +2 to -6
•10″ to Infinity Focus

GT14_G2SHP_af.jpg

3.GT-14 Gen2 Super High Performance (SHP) Image Intensifier
•Gen2 Super High Performance (SHP)
•Resolution: 51-64 lp/mm Typical
•Non-Filmed
•Non-Gated
•Automatic Brightness Control
•1x Magnification
•40º Field of View (FOV)
•F/1.2 Objective Lens
•EFL 23mm Ocular Lens
•Diopter +5 to -4
•10″ to Infinity Focus

D300_af1.jpg

4.D-300 Gen2 MILSPEC Image Intensifier
•Gen2+
•Resolution: 28-38 lp/mm Typical
•Non-Filmed
•Non-Gated
•Automatic Brightness Control
•1x Magnification
•40º Field of View (FOV)
•F/1.2 Objective Lens
•EFL 25mm Ocular Lens
•Diopter +2 to -4
•10″ to Infinity Focus

VIPER_af.jpg


5.ATN Viper Gen1 Image Intensifier (NVG0VIPR10)
•Gen1+
•Resolution: 40 lp/mm Typical
•Non-Film
•Non-Gated
•Automatic Brightness Control
•1x Magnification
•20º Field of View (FOV)
•F/1.4 Objective Lens
•EFL 35mm Ocular Lens
•Diopter +5 to -5
•1 m to Infinity Focus

These devices were selected because they can display the various generations and levels within generations of image intensifier technology. The units are all monocular-type and can be hand-held or head-mounted for a hands free capability. Emphasis was placed on individually-operated devices used in a “search and observe” capacity.
  • Like
Reactions: huntforever

Reloading Equipment Lowest Price on 30 Cal 150gr SP Bullets - Brand new 15.9 cents each + Free Shipping

New PPU 30 Caliber (.308") 150gr SP bullets - $159 / 1,000 ct + Free Shipping

ravenrocksprecision.com

PPU 30 Cal (.308") 150gr Jacketed Spire Point (SP) Bullets - Raven Rocks Precision

New PPU 30 Cal (.308") 150gr Jacketed Spire Point Bullets for reloading
ravenrocksprecision.com
ravenrocksprecision.com
Smaller quantities available as well.

So the asshole can write a book about it


But did nothing to go against the narrative that old Potato was fit and mentally sound commander in chief.

Why have none of the enablers of the rape of the Republic been brought to justice- we all know who they are .
  • Like
Reactions: geek65 and Ronws

SOLD 30 nosler sale- Brass dies and guages

4 new boxes of 50
1 box with 23 in them
1 redding full length bushing die and 1 body die.

Dies $100
Brass $100 per box so $400 total and I will throw in the 23 brass.
I also have a go and no go guages $ 75 for both.

I would like to sale as package deal.

Would like to move this stuff fast

Attachments

  • 20250302_140459.jpg
    20250302_140459.jpg
    627 KB · Views: 34
  • 20250302_140450.jpg
    20250302_140450.jpg
    756.6 KB · Views: 31
  • 20250302_140441.jpg
    20250302_140441.jpg
    404.9 KB · Views: 33
  • 20250302_140419.jpg
    20250302_140419.jpg
    667.8 KB · Views: 32
  • 20250302_140410.jpg
    20250302_140410.jpg
    543.8 KB · Views: 31
  • 20250302_140357.jpg
    20250302_140357.jpg
    528.9 KB · Views: 33
  • 20250302_140352.jpg
    20250302_140352.jpg
    932.9 KB · Views: 34

Any Old Remington Employees Here, or Smiths Experienced On the Remington 700?

Having an issue with feeding from two Rem 700's both in 6.5 Creed. They were perfect before getting pillar bedded. So now they both shoot fantastic, but dont feed worth a dam. They aways pass the hand feeding dummies test, but on the range is ALWAYS a whole other story; must be the recoil that does something.
The only thing I could find was that after they were bedded, the blind magazine box kinda had some vertical play in it. Noticed that when I took the action out of the stock and bolted the bottom metal back up to it to see how it looked assembled. Noticed the action screws were now too long and would interfere with the bolt. I asked myself how could this be? If this is mated perfectly without the stock, how are the screws too long?
Now I see - the assembled (in the stock) rifle is longer (taller) inside the stock than it is without. So then after it was all back together again and with the floor plate open, I could stick my hand in there and slide the mag box up and down about four millimeters. This to me didnt seem right but I was told by someone there was indeed supposed to be that play in there.
While looking at the mag box, spring and follower design, I noticed the blued steel mag box was different than the stainless model I have. And they're both different than the ones you see on Ebay that have the little tab or eye on back of the box, where I think you can screw this box down to the action.
1. This box that can be screwed down to the action; it seems older. Is it? Was this discontinued? What was it for originally?
2. My stainless mag box has what appear to be laser cuts in it, and the folds to act like feed lips are more aggressive (closer) Why did the design change? Or was one meant for the 308 and the other a 6.5 creed? I dont know. Was it just a product improvement/change proposal over the years?

stainless mag box.png
blued mag box.jpg
  • Like
Reactions: bmash