• Watch Out for Scammers!

    We've now added a color code for all accounts. Orange accounts are new members, Blue are full members, and Green are Supporters. If you get a message about a sale from an orange account, make sure you pay attention before sending any money!

6.5 creedmoor vs .308

Surgikill said:
I was able to use a 6.8 spc ii and get significant velocities from shorter barrels that would out perform a 6.5 cm

Outperform the 6.5 Creedmoor with a 6.8 -how- exactly?

140gr bullet at 2550fps+ from a 16.5" 6.5 Creedmoor, 2800fps with 123s.

And Hornady Creedmoor brass is not much more expensive than RP 260 brass (if you can find it) and its better. Its also about 30% cheaper than Lapua 260 brass (which I use).
 
Last edited:
Outperform the 6.5 Creedmoor with a 6.8 -how- exactly?

140gr bullet at 2550fps+ from a 16.5" 6.5 Creedmoor, 2800fps with 123s.

And Hornady Creedmoor brass is not much more expensive than RP 260 brass (if you can find it) and its better. Its also about 30% cheaper than Lapua 260 brass (which I use).

I was getting 2400 out of a 20" barrel with the 6.8. Last time I checked I didn't know 6.5 cm was able to be pushed that fast from that short a barrel.

Also, buy Winchester 7mm 08 brass and neck down for 260.

Sent from GS3 Synergy
 
I'm not buying a full tac ops rifle, I'm buying a .308 sps tactical then mike said he would true it, bed it, and everything else he does to a tac ops except finish and molded grips, but I have to send him the rifle, a krieger barrel, and a stock and he will be putting it together (so I'm buying all the parts).

Also it'll be a year and a half before I have the cash (in that year in a half ill have graduation, 2 bays, this years bday will be in december plus next december, and 2 Christmas, plus allowance, so lots a cash coming in ;)

I think you'd like the 6.5 or better yet a 6 Creedmoor way more than a 308, the Creeds are so much more enjoyable to shoot vs a 308 it's not even funny, have GAP send you some 6 Creed brass and learn how to reload, its not that hard, even I can do it.
 
I think you'd like the 6.5 or better yet a 6 Creedmoor way more than a 308, the Creeds are so much more enjoyable to shoot vs a 308 it's not even funny, have GAP send you some 6 Creed brass and learn how to reload, its not that hard, even I can do it.

Go back and read his OP. He is a young kid, 13 if I'm not mistaken. He probably can't afford a custom stick and reloading equipment on top of that.... He is trying to stay economical with his purchase. 308 is a great learning round, it will really make you appreciate the wind cheater calibers when you can afford to step up to one.
 
Go back and read his OP. He is a young kid, 13 if I'm not mistaken. He probably can't afford a custom stick and reloading equipment on top of that.... He is trying to stay economical with his purchase. 308 is a great learning round, it will really make you appreciate the wind cheater calibers when you can afford to step up to one.

And he can always re barrel the 308 to another caliber if/when he shoots it out.

Sent from GS3 Synergy
 
Thank you very much, I have seen the light but there aren't any youth competitions that I know of in missouri

I have to say I'm highly impressed with all the responses here. You guys are really doing this guy a solid by providing serious advise that he would not get on most other forums.This series of posts by Zak Smith is a few years old but there's some good stuff in it.

http://demigodllc.com/articles/practical-long-range-rifle-shooting-equipment/


Search around on his site and see what else he has. There are write ups on DOPE cards and other information. The Hide has all that and more. Buy Frank's book and DVD and sign up for his training videos. You'll get way more out of it than buying a custom rifle. Learn to reload and run your .243 would be my suggestion.But to your comment above...

I shot the Wyoming Tactical Rifle Championships last year, which is a team match, against two guys that were not old enough to drive. Their parents brought them to the match in Wyoming from Wisconsin. They were fiends that had been shooting together for a couple years but had never shot a match like this. Upon arriving they had gear issues with at least one of their guns and basically ended up being sponsored by the match coordinators with a borrowed gun gear.

So the long range rifle position was being shot with a rifle the guy had never fired before in his life.My partner and I were both running high dollar setups... We prob had $15k+ in combined gear with us on the stages without question. But my partner and I live 8 hours apart and are both a little lazy when it comes to training to a specific event. These guys were not, they knew the format and training for it.

They trained together and communicated well and worked together well. And when they hit the field stages, they RAN from shoot position to shoot position and they handed our asses to us in the overall standing. They ran their borrowed gear and their training made them successful. They walked away with some nice prizes and an impressive finish. The point is, these guys were not shooting in a youth league, they were shooting with the big boys and they did outstanding. There's photos of them in the thread I linked above.

See if you can find someone to mentor you and get someone your own age to train with and develop your skills together. Training with a partner is a huge help and then if you can find a team match it's a great way to get going in these type of matching without being totally on your own.
 
Last edited:
The Hide never ceases to amaze me, in a good way. I'm glad that we've been able to get beyond "The salmon is 13 years old" stuff and give him decent answers to his questions.

Here are my thoughts, salmon. If I had to choose between a 6.5CM and a 308 assuming the same barrel length for an all-around rifle (say 22-24"), then the 6.5CM is going to give you better ballistics. However, for a kid (not a pejorative term here) just getting into LR shooting, you've got to prioritize what you HAVE to have versus what you WANT to have. In that sense, I think a 308 is a better buy for you in terms of ammo availability. If you were going to be making your own ammo and could spend a couple grand on the components to always have 6.5CM on hand, then I'd say go for it. But you're going to be competing with a lot of guys to get the factory Hornady 6.5CM ammo whenever it becomes available, whereas 308 ammo is more available in general. Practice practice practice. There's a saying that crops up a lot on the Hide: the Indian is more important than the bow and arrow. Give a bad shooter a fantastic gun and the shooter's bad form, habits, etc. cannot take advantage of his rig. A great shooter on a factory 308 will outshoot the bad shooter with a TacOps every time.

For someone just getting started, the rifle that will give you the most trigger time will be the best one for you. Even though a lot of guys shoot the big boomers (myself included), many of us have .22LR trainers so that we don't have to spend thousands of dollars to maintain the fundamentals. Beyond 22LR, a 223 match chamber bolt gun will give you great, inexpensive practice in learning to read wind and judge distance (and therefore bullet drop).

So get a good rifle, a good scope, and save your money for ammunition since you probably won't be reloading for a while (unless you've got a parent/relative/close family friend that will teach you). Once you have the equipment, you need to learn the fundamentals that make you a good shooter, which means finding someone who can mentor and teach you. You don't want to practice bad habits. Be patient, and take this one step at a time. I've been shooting since I was your age and made many mistakes (and wasted a good chunk of money), simply because I was self-taught. Some guys who are self-taught are winning matches and masterful shooters. That tends to be the exception, and not the rule. If I were you, I'd definitely get a training subscription to Lowlight's videos and watch them (and re-watch them). Practice at home with dry-firing (and practice VERY safe gun handling practices!!!), then when your parents can take you to a range, practice perfecting a few of Lowlight's techniques at a time.

Good luck, and keep us informed with how you're doing.
 
Go back and read his OP. He is a young kid, 13 if I'm not mistaken. He probably can't afford a custom stick and reloading equipment on top of that.... He is trying to stay economical with his purchase. 308 is a great learning round, it will really make you appreciate the wind cheater calibers when you can afford to step up to one.

I know Sam is 13, Im just saying if he goes and does the "custom" thing get one of the Creeds, if he wants economical go and get a scope and rings for his 22 and shoot at 200yds plus, if he can find the ammo that is, would help if they brought production of the 22 shells back up to where it used to be, too. Course, thats a profit margin thing and the 22 cant win in that venue.
 
And he can always re barrel the 308 to another caliber if/when he shoots it out.

Sent from GS3 Synergy

That would be a good choice. Learn on the 308 as your barrel life is going to be pretty high. Then when its accuracy degrades, re-barrel to a 6.5 caliber.
 
Get a 260 so brass doesn't kill you. I'm not positive about velocities though from that short of barrel. I was able to use a 6.8 spc ii and get significant velocities from shorter barrels that would out perform a 6.5 cm

Errrr, not at LONG RANGE!!

6.8SPC is a MEDIUM RANGE cartridge at best. It doesn't even come close at long range.

Short, light, fat bullet vs long, thin, heavy bullet? I know where my money is going...

N
 
The Hide never ceases to amaze me, in a good way. I'm glad that we've been able to get beyond "The salmon is 13 years old" stuff and give him decent answers to his questions.

Here are my thoughts, salmon. If I had to choose between a 6.5CM and a 308 assuming the same barrel length for an all-around rifle (say 22-24"), then the 6.5CM is going to give you better ballistics. However, for a kid (not a pejorative term here) just getting into LR shooting, you've got to prioritize what you HAVE to have versus what you WANT to have. In that sense, I think a 308 is a better buy for you in terms of ammo availability. If you were going to be making your own ammo and could spend a couple grand on the components to always have 6.5CM on hand, then I'd say go for it. But you're going to be competing with a lot of guys to get the factory Hornady 6.5CM ammo whenever it becomes available, whereas 308 ammo is more available in general. Practice practice practice. There's a saying that crops up a lot on the Hide: the Indian is more important than the bow and arrow. Give a bad shooter a fantastic gun and the shooter's bad form, habits, etc. cannot take advantage of his rig. A great shooter on a factory 308 will outshoot the bad shooter with a TacOps every time.

For someone just getting started, the rifle that will give you the most trigger time will be the best one for you. Even though a lot of guys shoot the big boomers (myself included), many of us have .22LR trainers so that we don't have to spend thousands of dollars to maintain the fundamentals. Beyond 22LR, a 223 match chamber bolt gun will give you great, inexpensive practice in learning to read wind and judge distance (and therefore bullet drop).

So get a good rifle, a good scope, and save your money for ammunition since you probably won't be reloading for a while (unless you've got a parent/relative/close family friend that will teach you). Once you have the equipment, you need to learn the fundamentals that make you a good shooter, which means finding someone who can mentor and teach you. You don't want to practice bad habits. Be patient, and take this one step at a time. I've been shooting since I was your age and made many mistakes (and wasted a good chunk of money), simply because I was self-taught. Some guys who are self-taught are winning matches and masterful shooters. That tends to be the exception, and not the rule. If I were you, I'd definitely get a training subscription to Lowlight's videos and watch them (and re-watch them). Practice at home with dry-firing (and practice VERY safe gun handling practices!!!), then when your parents can take you to a range, practice perfecting a few of Lowlight's techniques at a time.

Good luck, and keep us informed with how you're doing.

I know gun safety i passed my hunter safety course but lord there was a huge mistake made by the guys teaching it:

They said they would show us a video about a hunting accident, so the 70 year old teacher turned on his computer and hit play on the video, so he hit play and the video started playing and it was PORN!!! The dude forgot to exit out of his private video time.

I got apoligy notes and merchandise every month
 
Last edited:
Errrr, not at LONG RANGE!!

6.8SPC is a MEDIUM RANGE cartridge at best. It doesn't even come close at long range.

Short, light, fat bullet vs long, thin, heavy bullet? I know where my money is going...

N

Back when I was doing development I was led to believe that it was going faster than a cm in shorter barrels. I made a response afterwards addressing this. It also has better wound channel characteristics. If you're just shooting paper that doesn't matter. I ess also using a high bc 130 grain Berger. I could *almost* match the trajectory of a .308.

Sent from GS3 Synergy
 
Last edited:
I know gun safety i passed my hunter safety course but lord there was a huge mistake made by the guys teaching it:

They said they would show us a video about a hunting accident, so the 70 year old teacher turned on his computer and hit play on the video, so he hit play and the video started playing and it was PORN!!! The dude forgot to exit out of his private video time.

I got apoligy notes and merchandise every month


I did something similar when I was keeping service records on my personal computer. I took my laptop into the office to do my weekly paperwork so I could print it off for the office lady and when I started my computer, it started playing a porn. The office lady looked over at me and started laughing her ass off, she then asked what I was up to last night lol.
 
Back when I was doing development I was led to believe that it was going faster than a cm in shorter barrels. I made a response afterwards addressing this. It also has better wound channel characteristics. If you're just shooting paper that doesn't matter. I ess also using a high bc 130 grain Berger. I could *almost* match the trajectory of a .308.

Oh, I thought you were talking about factory fodder. Still cant see the 6.8 coming close to the 6.5Creedmoor though. 130grn Berger VLD Hunting, G7 BC 0.282 lists at 2805fps in the Berger manual, I'm pretty sure that most guys can run it a bit faster than that.

You're not equating the 6.5CM with the 6.5Grendel, are you??

N
 
180JLK VLD long boat-tails. I can get 2765, but with pressure signs. I see the Creedmoor guys running very long barrels with factory ammo in order to stay above 2800. I suppose it would be fine to handload it to 2900+, but I do that with a .260 loaded long with .620BC JLKs. The advantage of the Creed is (affordable) factory ammo.

I was just wondering as I haven't heard of a .30 with that high a BC at those speeds. Should have figured it was JLK. LOL

I wouldn't call 26" very long. A 26" barrel will keep factory going at good speed around 2800fps which will do what a .308 handload will do but if you compare .308 handloads to 6.5 Creedmoor handloads then it's a different story. You can get 200fps on the .308 with similar BC bullet. That 2930fps is at 2.820" OAL so no long load needed But I am sure the .260 could send out the 140 AMAX at the same speed and length. I am sure the JLKs are longer and sleeker to go with that price tag ;)
 
THAT'S IT. I was confusing the cm with the grendel. The 6.8 WILL out perform the grendel, not the creedmoor.

And I'm using the Berger 130 match classic which has a higher bc, just under .5 I think.

Sent from GS3 Synergy
 
So which would you guys prefer if Sam was looking at a 6.5CM or a 6CM? I mean, the 6.5CM can be pushed what, 2950ish, 6CM can be pushed 3200ish accurately?
 
Get a 260 so brass doesn't kill you. I'm not positive about velocities though from that short of barrel. I was able to use a 6.8 spc ii and get significant velocities from shorter barrels that would out perform a 6.5 cm

Sent from GS3 Synergy

My 6.5C brass costs same as 308.

DO y'all ever get tired of giving bad info?
 
So which would you guys prefer if Sam was looking at a 6.5CM or a 6CM? I mean, the 6.5CM can be pushed what, 2950ish, 6CM can be pushed 3200ish accurately?

6.5 Creedmoor is going to be better for the beginner. No one makes factory 6 Creedmoor ammo. It all has to be loaded by the rifle owner or one company that offers it. Very limiting on your ammo options.
 
I dont' even see how this thread got 4 pages.


6.5 Creedmoor > .308 win.


End of story, it's better in every way. Flatter, cuts wind better, less recoil, and carries more energy at distance. Even on game I believe 6.5 Creedmoor is better.
At 600 yards a

130g berger VLD 1219.9 ft lbs of energy.
130g SST 1075.8, ft lbs of energy.
140g Berger VLD 1263.4 ft lbs of energy.
140 AMAX 1219.8ft lbs of energy.

.308
210g Berger VLD 1232.7 ft lbs of energy.
178 amax 1111.1 ft lbs of energy.
165 interbond 1069.3ft lbs of energy.


/thread

Agreed totally, not even a question.

My question still remains, and no one seems to have a straight answer. So many are saying that 6.5 Cred is somehow better than .260, and there is almost no evidence to support that, mostly conjecture. They both push a smilier grain bullet about as fast with similar BC. They both eat barrels more than .308. But at least if you already have a .308 it's easy to go right to a .260.
 
Sako man said:
So many are saying that 6.5 Cred is somehow better than .260

Ballistically "better"? No.

Logistically "better"? I'd say yes. Availability & price of factory ammo, availability/price/quality of brass, shorter OAL to make it friendlier for loading at mag length.

And I own two 260s and zero 6.5 Creedmoors.
 
My 6.5C brass costs same as 308.

DO y'all ever get tired of giving bad info?

Lapua Brass, probably, but the kid isn't going to be reloading I bet seeing as he is fifteen.

[MENTION=9621]Downzero[/MENTION] agreed but at barrel length I am pushing them faster which gives them a ballistic edge. 6.8 reaches almost full potential in twelve inches.

Sent from GS3 Synergy
 
Last edited:
My question still remains, and no one seems to have a straight answer. So many are saying that 6.5 Cred is somehow better than .260, and there is almost no evidence to support that, mostly conjecture. They both push a smilier grain bullet about as fast with similar BC.
Both cartridges use the same bullet, so 'similar' is not an issue. In factory loadings they are comparable. But if you throat and load a .260 long it will walk away from the 6.5. With my .260 I am getting 2970fps with a 130VLD out of a 24" barrel, and no pressure yet. Try that with the 6.5 and see how far you get.

At my velocities at the same barrel length it will. It will also have better wound channel characteristics.
[MENTION=9621]Downzero[/MENTION] agreed but at barrel length I am pushing them faster which gives them a ballistic edge. 6.8 reaches almost full potential in twelve inches.
And even 'would channel characteristics'?!! Hmmmm.... Please quit with the bad info while you're behind. You're making this stuff up.
 
Last edited:
Both cartridges use the same bullet, so 'similar' is not an issue. In factory loadings they are comparable. But if you throat and load a .260 long it will walk away from the 6.5. With my .260 I am getting 2970fps with a 130VLD out of a 24" barrel, and no pressure yet. Try that with the 6.5 and see how far you get.

And even 'would channel characteristics'?!! Hmmmm.... Please quit with the bad info while you're behind. You're making this stuff up.

I find it insulting that you won't even consider it. The 6.8 was chosen over the 6.5 because it showed improved terminal performance on target and was more manageable than a .30 due to recoil. In same length barrels it will travel faster than a 6.5. You need ~4 inches more barrel length in the grendel in order to exceed 6.8 velocities.

I hope you realize I'm taking about the grendel and not the cm. We sorted that out earlier.

Sent from GS3 Synergy
 
I find it insulting that you won't even consider it. The 6.8 was chosen over the 6.5 because it showed improved terminal performance on target and was more manageable than a .30 due to recoil. In same length barrels it will travel faster than a 6.5.
You might find yourself better-off by reading than by posting. Maybe start with the stickies and work from there.
 
Last edited:
You might be better off reading than posting. maybe start with the stickies and work from there.

Please just show me the info. Sorry salmon for de railing your thread. I still say go with a 308 for cheap ammo or a 260 seeing as 308 is scarce now. You can always re barrel.

Sent from GS3 Synergy
 
I find it insulting that you won't even consider it. The 6.8 was chosen over the 6.5 because it showed improved terminal performance on target and was more manageable than a .30 due to recoil. In same length barrels it will travel faster than a 6.5. You need ~4 inches more barrel length in the grendel in order to exceed 6.8 velocities.

I hope you realize I'm taking about the grendel and not the cm. We sorted that out earlier.

Sent from GS3 Synergy

There is no comparison between the 6.8 and the 6.5 grendel. The grendel will outperform the 6.8 in long range shooting. Just go run the ballistics on JBM and you will see it.
 
There is no comparison between the 6.8 and the 6.5 grendel. The grendel will outperform the 6.8 in long range shooting. Just go run the ballistics on JBM and you will see it.

I have that's why I'm saying it. But ONLY out of similar length barrels under 20". I can push a 130 grain bullet out of a 20" barrel at 2550. I'd like to see those velocities for a grendel at that length barrel. My bullet has a .496 bc fwiw

Sent from GS3 Synergy
 
There is no comparison between the 6.8 and the 6.5 grendel. The grendel will outperform the 6.8 in long range shooting.
And the correct answer has nothing to do with velocity.

Between the 6.5 and the .308 the question is whether one needs to step-up to the 6.5. If you are consistently placing second or third with your .308, behind 6.5 shooters, then I would say it's worth it. Otherwise the advantages of barrel life, ease of use and versatility of the .308 outweigh the advantages of any other caliber that uses the same case.
 
Lapua Brass, probably, but the kid isn't going to be reloading I bet seeing as he is fifteen.

[MENTION=9621]Downzero[/MENTION] agreed but at barrel length I am pushing them faster which gives them a ballistic edge. 6.8 reaches almost full potential in twelve inches.

Sent from GS3 Synergy

You obviously have no idea what you're talking about; as stated above, spend 5 minutes on JBM. You'd immediately see that what you're saying is false.

What you're saying makes little sense anyway, because given two hypothetical cartridges of the same capacity, ballistic coefficient tells you everything that you need to know.

The only way a larger diameter bullet with a lower BC could ever hang with the 6.5mm cartridges is for it to have significantly greater capacity than the 6.5 cartridge that you're comparing it to.

There's no magic cartridge or bullet and all of them operate on the same principle. A bigger and less efficient bullet can't make up the difference with velocity if the capacity simply isn't there to push it.
 
And the correct answer has nothing to do with velocity.

Between the 6.5 and the .308 the question is whether one needs to step-up to the 6.5. If you are consistently placing second or third with your .308, behind 6.5 shooters, then I would say it's worth it. Otherwise the advantages of barrel life, ease of use and versatility of the .308 outweigh the advantages of any other caliber that uses the same case.

I didn't say anything about velocity. We both know it's the bc of the 6.5 bullets
 
I didn't say anything about velocity. We both know it's the bc of the 6.5 bullets
Read the posts by Surgikill.... On second thought, don't bother.

HUh? speaking of conjecture. Thats some crazy CSI shit! Do people make sure they wear their sunglasses while writing some of this stuff. I'm shaking my head at this moment.
What does this post mean?
 
Last edited:
[MENTION=56901]Bradu[/MENTION] [MENTION=9621]Downzero[/MENTION]: My bullet has a bc of .496, the 123 a-max has a bc of .510. I already sent the data to graham. Whether he will read it and interpret it is up to him. I plugged my data in with comparable 6.5 data. How about you do the same, I'll give you the info.

6.8 spcii
130 berger match classic .496 bc
2550 fps

6.5 grendel
123 a-max .510 bc
2495 fps


Plug that in and tell me what happens.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.jpg
    Capture.jpg
    19.7 KB · Views: 33
Last edited:
Now you are selecting information - bullets and velocities - to make yourself appear to be correct.

YOU sent me a link with information on it. I merely used the information you provided. NOT my fault you can't find supporting data. ALSO, don't give me any bolt gun shot loads, because the grendel gets cranky when you want to push it too much out of an AR.
 
You sent me a link to a specific thread with specific velocities of bullets being shot out of a 6.5 grendel with an 18.5 inch barrel. I can attach said message if you forgot what you sent. Why can you not accept the fact that a 6.8 will out perform a 6.5? I never said it will out perform it in every way, shape, and form, but it still has the capability to out perform it. Obviously there are certain bullet combinations with the 6.5 that will make it out perform a 6.8 and vice versa.
 
Why can you not accept the fact that a 6.8 will out perform a 6.5? I never said it will out perform it in every way, shape, and form, but it still has the capability to out perform it. Obviously there are certain bullet combinations with the 6.5 that will make it out perform a 6.8 and vice versa.
Now you are hedging: 'Never said' 'in every way' but 'still has the capability' to outperform....

Sure: The one high BC 6.8 bullet, at a higher velocity than a very low BC, lower velocity 6.5 bullet, will get you close - at those velocities under those conditions in an unequal comparison.

My 180gr .580BC .308 handloads at 2740fps will probably better my 130gr .585BC .260 factory ammo at 2680fps. But a .308 will not outperform a .260.

I can accept the fact that my .22LR pistol will outperform my .308 rifle - each and every time the rifle misfires.
 
Last edited:
I have that's why I'm saying it. But ONLY out of similar length barrels under 20". I can push a 130 grain bullet out of a 20" barrel at 2550. I'd like to see those velocities for a grendel at that length barrel. My bullet has a .496 bc fwiw

Sent from GS3 Synergy

You are WAY OFF BASE here. Stop guessing.

I run a 12.5" 6.5 Grendel (SBR) and get over 2550 fps on AA 120gr TNT ammo. The 6.8 never took off like they claimed because of its lack of performance past 300 yards. The Grendel performs at almost any range, even CQB, which it was not developed for.
 
Now you are hedging: 'Never said' 'in every way' but 'still has the capability' to outperform....

Sure: The one high BC 6.8 bullet, at a higher velocity than a very low BC, lower velocity 6.5 bullet, will get you close - at those velocities under those conditions in an unequal comparison.

But then my 180gr .580BC .308 handloads at 2740fps will probably equal my 130gr .585BC .260 factory ammo at 2680fps.

And I can also accept the fact that my .22LR pistol will outperform my .308 rifle - each and every time the rifle misfires.


Is there any way that you can have a civilized conversation on a forum with somebody? I put in what you gave me. Give me info for a 123 scenar or a 140 grain bullet and I'll punch it in. The 6.5 may very well out perform it. I am not hedging anything either, just trying to make myself clear, seeing as you *assumed* that I thought the 6.8 was better in every way. They are very close to say the least. I bet you didn't know they have a factory 140 vld for the 6.8 that comes out around 2400fps.
[MENTION=19671]KYS[/MENTION] I can't find a 120 grain TNT. Could you please point me to the ammo you are using? I would like to see it.
 
Is there any way that you can have a civilized conversation on a forum with somebody? I put in what you gave me. Give me info for a 123 scenar or a 140 grain bullet and I'll punch it in. The 6.5 may very well out perform it. I am not hedging anything either, just trying to make myself clear, seeing as you *assumed* that I thought the 6.8 was better in every way. They are very close to say the least. I bet you didn't know they have a factory 140 vld for the 6.8 that comes out around 2400fps.
[MENTION=19671]KYS[/MENTION] I can't find a 120 grain TNT. Could you please point me to the ammo you are using? I would like to see it.

I suggest you start here https://www.sierrabullets.com/store/product.cfm/sn/1742/264-dia-65mm-142-gr-HPBT-MatchKing
 
What does this post mean?

I screwed my post up before I could remove it. It was in reference to bullet wound damage and a bunch of crap. As you understand it's difficult to navigate through all of the BS. My bad. From here out I am going to refer to Litz's book if I want to understand the terminal ballistics of a certain projectile.

Cheers!
 
Salmon, get your popcorn out!

Like some have said, get yourself some ammo and practice practice practice! At such a young age, it will help you down the line. Save yourself some money and get a really nice scope.

Let the debate on the .308 vs 6.5 cm live on with others. Heck, you might be married and retired from the military by the time that one is settled.......

Either way, enjoy yourself and keep us posted on hour successes.

Good luck